• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not sure if Milei has been in power for long enough to have any sort of meaningful impact.

      Doing things the regular way, he wouldn’t have.

      That’s not what he’s doing, though. He’s tearing apart huge chunks of the government apparatus that people depend on with no safety nets or other mitigation of inevitable consequences.

      It’s like the “let’s tear down each wall until we find out which ones are load bearing” approach to governance. Except they all are and he just keeps swinging his +5 Sledgehammer of Demagogue Stupidity.

      • catsup@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        except they all are

        [Citation needed]

        Demagogue Stupidity

        Right, because its was so much more Democratic and smart to vote for the drug addict, corrupt, 400% inflation-rate causer, Sergio Massa

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 months ago

      The former government contributed a lot to this, specially in the last year. Poverty has been steadily on the rise since 2003. I cant (imo) blame Milei for this, but I can’t deny that if anything Milei has accelerated the impact of Kirchners’ missmanagement.

      Another things to keep in mind, the Kirchners were famous for lying about inflation and poverty indices and this government is consequently “taking pride” in transparency. Milei is also using this numbers to show how bad the economy is… so numbers could be biased or exaggerated.

      Poverty here is generally measured by household income, which means that inflation leaves a lot of people under the poverty line, which may or not be momentary cause we get constant salary increases… always under inflation, of course.

      The thing is really bad, and people is living out of savings. A sign of that is that we can buy US$ by 1400 pesos in a bank, but people is selling so many dollars in the black market to pay bills that we can buy them for 1000 pesos on the streets.

      If all this mess will pay out in the long term, I cant tell, but appealing to our erratic history, I would say that it won’t.

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        First move of any new management is to take the worst possible stocktake and shine the worst possible light to last management’s figures. Then any meagre positive movement or even if things remain the same will look like improvement.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Where are you buying pesos at 1400?!

        Also, the blue exchange is so small that it doesn’t even affect the economy

        • Siegfried@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The thing is, I’m not. But if you buy legal dollars, it’s ~800 +75% (a part of that are 30% or so taxes, the other part are 45% or so retentions that are returned as tax deduction doing the proper paperwork).

          I held the retained part as taxes because of high inflation, but that’s just me.

          You can follow that as “dollar tarjeta”

          The blue was near 1350 some time ago and started falling when people began to sell their dollars. Now it is slightly cheaper than buying legal dollars + taxes - retentions.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      When you remove all financial support from people who need it to survive, they instantly are poor, it doesn’t take years.

      But I’m sure it’s a hard to swallow pill for liberals.

    • Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yeah. I’m hardly a fan of everything he says or does, but it’s a bit like appointing a new captain an hour after the Titanic hit the iceberg, then blaming him for not stopping the ship from sinking. Argentina was well on its way to hyperinflation long before the presidential elections.