• Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah I felt like DOS2 had really improved on the already good formula that was DOS, and BG3 using the DnD system felt like a big step back. It’s still a great game, but I feel like it is in spite of the DND systems (not the setting), not because of it. DND doesn’t feel suited for the computer, it really fits better on the tabletop.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      Really? I thought it fit great.

      That said, I’ve only played a few minutes of DOS2 so I didn’t have much to compare it to.

      I’ve also never played DnD but BG3 convinced me to join my friends’ weekly Pathfinder session

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        As someone who’s played their fair share of assorted DnD systems, 5E has a number of issues that really hold it back. For instance, you’re not really supposed to long rest between every fight, but how do you tell players that without a proper DM? It’s a very weak mechanic that’s apparently too iconic to have just axed.

        Don’t get me wrong, 5E works better at what it’s supposed to - easily accessible and relatively low math tabletop roleplay. But a computer can do so much more.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Lots of RPGs allow rest cheesing. Even if you don’t let players rest in random locations like BG3 does, the players can always hoof it back to town to rest. Attempts to prevent this kind of cheesing often end up feeling unduly punishing and un-fun. It’s not a tabletop vs computer issue.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I guess I accidentally played by the “spirit” of 5E because I only long rested when I absolutely had to lol

          It took way too much of my precious gaming hours

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        D&D 5e is kind of bad system. It’s “good” in that it’s hard to make a bad character, and it’s popular, but that’s most of what it has going for it. It’s missing a lot of rules you’d want for a general purpose RPG. Centering it on rests only works in rather specific kinds of games. The magic system is very bespoke and thus clunky. The dice math if 1d20+stuff gives you a flat probability, which is often unsatisfying.

        Pathfinder 2e is widely considered better than 5e in every way, unless you actually specifically want the simple+shallowness of 5e. Which is a fine thing to want, but that is a pretty big trade off. If you were just playing with friends, you’d probably be better off with Fate or maybe a PbtA game if you want simple narrative stuff, or Gloomhaven if you just want a board game.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I find Pathfinder 2e (and D&D 3e before it) way clunkier. Maintaining a level-appropriate power level requires stacking buffs like the Overlord meme, and if you decline to do so, you’re just crippling your character. It’s bad enough that auto-buffing mods are considered mandatory for the Pathfinder CRPGs.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t like the Christmas tree effect either, where your character is less important than your stack of magic doodads and buffs.

            The pathfinder crpgs are 1e. I’m not sure how much changed in 2e, but I’m told it’s much better.

            Myself, I’m playing Fate now.

        • StraySojourner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Pf2e is great, and for those that want something lighter on the crunch there’s a bunch of better systems out there.

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        So did the rest of the planet when they voted it best game of the year

        Edit: removed unneeded hostility toward the other commenter

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t like of the dices but BG3 sucked my way more in than DOS2 so I how they really manage to combine the best of both in their next game. Let’s hope the expectations don’t get too high.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think making something on par with BG3 will be incredibly tough. Wouldn’t mind seeing them branch out and try something new again. Larian has done a bunch of different stuff before. A modern take on Ego Draconis would be really cool.