Far more animals than previously thought likely have consciousness, top scientists say in a new declaration — including fish, lobsters and octopus.

Bees play by rolling wooden balls — apparently for fun. The cleaner wrasse fish appears to recognize its own visage in an underwater mirror. Octopuses seem to react to anesthetic drugs and will avoid settings where they likely experienced past pain.

All three of these discoveries came in the last five years — indications that the more scientists test animals, the more they find that many species may have inner lives and be sentient. A surprising range of creatures have shown evidence of conscious thought or experience, including insects, fish and some crustaceans.

That has prompted a group of top researchers on animal cognition to publish a new pronouncement that they hope will transform how scientists and society view — and care — for animals.

Nearly 40 researchers signed “The New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness,” which was first presented at a conference at New York University on Friday morning. It marks a pivotal moment, as a flood of research on animal cognition collides with debates over how various species ought to be treated.

  • daltotron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    IS veganism the real solution here, or is the real solution the all-artificial, all-synthetic diet? Me personally, I’m going to down this jug of red 40, and then I think I’ll get back to you

    • capem@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Veganism is the solution, yes.

      Future generations will look back on us like we were crazy and barbaric for eating meat.

      • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        I agree that veganism is/could be a good solution moving forward. I strongly disagree that eating meat can be considered barbaric, as it is completely natural and present in every corner of the animal kingdom. Now, how we treat the animals we get that meat from is absolutely barbaric and should be considered so, but I don’t think meat eating itself should be villainized, at least in a retrospective sense.

        • festus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Just because something is natural doesn’t mean it isn’t barbaric. Male lions will regularly kill cubs to make the mother ready for sex - that’s natural but we’d never accept (correctly) a human doing that.

          • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I understand your point but I dont think that the male lion’s proclivity for infanticide is equivalent to human life simply because that is not a typical (i.e. natural) aspect of human society

            • festus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Rape then? Lots of animals rape and humans do so too. It’s ‘natural’ but barbaric.

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nah, synthetic food (and eventually discarding our gross meat shells for silicon and metal bodies) is the rightful path. On the way there, veganism is a nice stop-gap for most people.