Imagine being crushed by a 350k pound load while out driving. Holy moly Batman!

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let me guess: it happened because the relevant safety regulations were repealed or the authority in charge was dissolved or muzzled.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        The company can only get away with this sort of thing if there isn’t adequate oversight. The root cause is political. If that indeed had anything to do with it, which is speculation at this point.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        While this is probably what will happen because Texas, there was a really horrible limousine crash in New York and it basically destroyed the stretch limo industry

        • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m guessing the people involved in the limo crash that changed things where not poor normal people.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man I hope not. The owner or the truck or trucking company, or whoever was paid to transport the load, should be held liable. They paid the driver, subcontracted to an independent contractor and are therefore responsible for the performance. They could sue the driver/sub if they felt they misperformed by insurance should eat that trucking company alive for this.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depending on how the contracts are written, the transport company may now be extremely fucked too.

        This always happens. Skimp on safety to save pennies, then lose millions in equipment in a disaster. The person buying this equipment is going to demand a new one for free, and the supplier is going to point at the transporter.

        Justly so. Let them lose everything for trying to cut corners and killing people as a result.