I feel like that’s the point of using that picture though.
Yeah, maybe I’m the one getting wooshed here, but that seems like the perfect picture for this article. Seems intentional and entirely appropriate.
I’m getting a kick out of this hypothetical person responsible for correcting AI mistakes looking at AI image gen with deformed hands and saying “looks fine to me, totally normal.”
Looks intentional. I don’t think it’s even AI generated, but there’s too few pixels to tell for sure.
The picture is perfect. But they keyboard needs to have way too many keys.
Shit ass small factor keyboards…
Layers make keyboard go brrrrr
And text that looks like a combination of a foreign language no one knows and a worm writhing on the sidewalk after a thunderstorm.
Hahaha, spend millions or billions to train ai, use natural resources to power it all, then resort to humans fixing the shit that is AI 😂
I don’t even think it’s AI art but self ironic
Why are the results for Weird Al needing changes? Did he do a new Star Wars song, or polka medley?
Imagine how fast you’d type with dedicated punctuation fingers…
slower than by not using punctuation at all!
deleted by creator
Of course they used that picture to illustrate how flawed AI is at certain things.
Kind of gives me flashbacks to Amazon go stores. Despite them discussing all of their advanced technology to allow you to simply walk out with your groceries, around 70% had to be manually reviewed and corrected by an army of Indian technicians. I have a feeling this is going to be another case of ai meaning “A bunch of Indians”
just remotely hire some 10000 educated poor individuals in a third world country and done
Just a few more fingers and tadaa… spider hands.
How to spot the EMACS user.
I think it would be better served as a button/cliclable on individual search results as a sort of “summarize this page” and interactive Q&A based off of that individual entry. As it stands right now, it pulls too much garbage from all the combined results.