• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    So… that’s an admission. He can be charged?

    Texas, show us how much you care about protecting kids…

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s probably well past the statue of limitations.

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The statute of limitations does not apply. He’s a conservative “leader” in Texas. He ain’t gettin’ charged.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 months ago

            The statute of limitations only prevent old crimes from being dug up and brought to trial- mostly because at that point it’s hard to prove.

            The reality is, this guy absolutely won’t get charged. Because of the pure bias.

            Unless… someone were to, I dunno, tell Ken Paxton he did drag on Tuesday nights… but that would be totally unethical; and we really don’t need to play into that bullshit.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              That also needlessly furthers their association with child molesters and drag when drag had nothing to do with it.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Which is why it’d be totally unethical, yes.

                If it didn’t harm lgbtq/drag… it’d only be questionably unethical. Actually that could be an interesting ethics debate right there.