• nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        We found a COBOL programmer in the wild!

        I’d ask you to retire and finally give a young person a chance, but none of them want to wait for floppy drives to load.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    COBOL programmers have some of the highest salaries of any other languages specialized programmers, but I don’t know if that is due to rarity of COBOL programmers, the fact that those jobs are all government or financial institution employed, or because the average experience for them is 58 years?

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The idea that a job req could actually ask for “50+ years experience” in a given piece of computing technology just gives me goosebumps. Like someone did a really good job 50 years ago, or a really bad one. Either way, it’s astonishing that any one thing could be in production use that long or longer.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        When a piece of software does a very limited set of tasks that cannot be meaningfully improved, and when minor mistakes can equate to millions in cash or even lives lost or ruined, the name of the game is maintain, maintain, maintain. It ain’t broke, leave it the hell alone, because updating, upgrading or porting your system will inevitably lead to some sort of mistake.

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re exactly right. And if the retrocomputing and retrogaming communities have taught us anything, it’s that good emulation can make such systems last for a very long time.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      or because the average experience for them is 58 years

      Some have more?!

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most have more. Like 3 guys just learned it as a prank last year for the first time in generations, which kind of threw off the curve. Every other COBOL programmer is technically old enough to retire, but they are contractually required to continue working until the heat death of the universe.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          but they are contractually required to continue working until the heat death of the universe.

          This sounds worse than Russia. Please fix.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Contractors make a lot of money, but that would be separate to standard engineering salaries

      I’ve known a few people that graduated about a decade ago and decided to work in really niche tech like COBOL, Salesforce/SOQL/SOSL, VB6, Sitecore, etc. Hell, one guy I met was a professional “ActionScript” programmer! Many in-store and company kiosks used Flash to program their interfaces, so he’d do basic maintenance, add features, and collect six figures for half a year of work and all the travel around Europe/Asia he wants.

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have some experience and no formal training. If I dove into cobol classes and certs would that alone be enough for potential employers? Not in a get rich quick kind of way, but more of a ‘what’s the fastest way I can become attractive to employers without having to go back for a degree cause my current career is falling apart and I need to transition to something that isn’t actively injuring my body.” Kind of way…

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      New folks are learning it. Obviously not in droves, and obviously there is a lot of legacy knowledge, but new people are def training on it.

      • HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        COBOL is not hard to learn. But it takes years to develop the muscles in your fingers to the point where you can write a subroutine in a single session.

        • emergencybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I took courses in uni for COBOL and you’re right, the language itself isn’t difficult, it’s honestly a lot like writing plain Englisch but making sure your JCL was correct, checking I think it was the spool in order to make sure your jobs were working correctly, reading memory dumps, it was a ride. I love mainframe but it feels like all jobs mainframe ask for 5+ years experience

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      TL;DR: it’s probably not that hard to pick up compared to the complex and deep stacks we use today. Someone will give it a shot.

      COBOL is in a special place in our computing legacy. It’s too new to require intimate knowledge of the electronics that drive it (older systems and machine-code did), and is too old to be all that complicated (target machines were much smaller and slower). I would wager it’s actually not that hard to learn, and is probably a dream to code with modern equipment. You won’t be slowed down by punchcards, tape drives, time sharing, etc., and can probably use VSCode and an emulator to cover a ton of ground. The computing model is likely a straight line (storage -> compute -> storage), with little to no UI. In other words: simple by today’s standards.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Niche skills will demand higher salaries. Thus you’ll still get a few that learn it just to enter the niche.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They will unfreeze my head 1000 years from now like Futurama.

      Upon waking, scientists will welcome me to the future world…

      … Then ask if I wouldn’t mind making a change to a COBOL app still in use by the gov.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    Man I wish our politicians had as much tech savvy as these ancient COBOL programmers.

    Well, I guess they will, once these folks retire and start running for president.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, I guess they will, once these folks retire and start running for president.

      Lol, we all wish.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think that they’re using COBOL. Isn’t that more finance oriented, or am I mistaken?

    I’m on an airline currently and network too shit to Google properly. Please excuse.

    • azan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, I mean it’s used for transactions in the programming sense of the word. Turns out financial transactions require that as well. I assume the same goes for nuclear stuff. There is just very little risk to come across uncertainties when the language is that old (and the people who use it hehe - tbf it pays super well).

      Edit: at least to my very limited knowledge

  • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d actually be more surprised to learn they didn’t move to Ada when that was THE DOD programming language.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are Udemy courses on cobol, I’m sure any developer can get up to speed pretty fast.

    Or just use an LLM, like the rest of us now

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Speak for yourself. I don’t use LLMs and never will.

      It always irks me when people talk about it like it’s universal and inevitable when that’s very far from the case. There are many, many issues with them and many developers wisely choose to ignore the fad.