A federal appeals court has agreed to halt the reinstatement of net neutrality rules until August 5th, while the court considers whether more permanent action is justified.

It’s the latest setback in a long back and forth on net neutrality — the principle that internet service providers (ISPs) should not be able to block or throttle internet traffic in a discriminatory manner.

The current FCC, which has three Democratic and two Republican commissioners, voted in April to bring back net neutrality. The 3–2 vote was divided along party lines.

Broadband providers have since challenged the FCC’s action, which is potentially more vulnerable after the Supreme Court’s recent decision to strike down Chevron deference — a legal doctrine that instructed courts to defer to an agency’s expert decisions except in a very narrow range of circumstances.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Matt Schettenhelm said in a report prior to the court’s ruling that he doesn’t expect the FCC to prevail in court, in large part due to the demise of Chevron.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m more of a free market guy than most of y’all, but the internet should clearly be treated as a utility.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        18 hours later: Crickets

        They aren’t going to answer this question. Nobody reveals their stupidity on purpose.

        Besides, we already know what all the Capitalist propaganda says. We know what the answer would be.

      • Lojcs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah random guy on the internet, justify yourself

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s not what I asked them to do. I disagree with free markets, but that doesn’t mean I’m resistant to learning from other people’s perspectives.

          • Lojcs@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I didn’t mean you were, that just sounded strangely judgemental for a question asked to a random person on the internet who you probably never saw before and will most likely ignore it

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I get it, but maybe they won’t. They definitely will ignore my question if I never ask!

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Telecos hate the idea of free market on the internet when they are providing the service.

      From their perspective, they are entitled to that cut… Why should Google get it all?

      • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe because we’ve been paying them a tax since the early 2000’s to provide fiber broadband to the majority of Americans, which they have pocketed and refused to actually build any infrastructure to support this?

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Critical thinking has been spotted!

          Telcos are the worst of corporate parasites, at least telsa built a car and SpaceX built a rocket, and Boeing can build a plane

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I feel like everyone within developed countries should offer everyone a bare minimum free internet access. Like, even if it’s as slow as dialup, at least it would still be access.

      Then, if you want high speed internet, which I’m sure most people would want, then you pay monthly for that of course.

      But this whole thing they’re doing now, where they can throttle or even block sites at their own discretion for paying customers, well that’s just totally back-asswards…