The administration of US President Joe Biden refuses to transfer long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, despite requests from Kyiv and pressure from US lawmakers.

  • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a tragedy that these have not yet been sent. There should already be a production line set up to deliver hundreds per month.

        • Bison1911@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have inside knowledge on this because I support[ed] production for a part of this system. I can’t divulge too much information obviously, but we can still manufacture ATACMS. The real issue is a lot of the components and manufacturing processes are terribly out-of-date so it’s questionable whether it’s worth it when the replacement is on the horizon.

        • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a complicated one. Military tech tends to all be 10+ years old at time of deployment and the ones stockpiled are probably late 90s designs that went into production in the early 2000s. Most of the parts for the control and guidance systems are likely no longer produced at all and haven’t been for a decade+ (think the kinds of computer chips you’d find in a SNES, maaaaybe an N64) so it’s not that they don’t have the blueprint somewhere, they would have to re design large parts of it to work in a modern supply chain. Yes, they could do emulation/simulation shenanigans to get some stuff to be compatible on modem COTS hardware but they’d still need to re qualify everything because nobody wants a 500lb ballistic warhead going stupid and killing someone in the wrong country.

          • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That sounds like it might be true, but is it? I’ve heard many things in relation to this weapon, but not anything about the inability to produce them.

            • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Shrug? This is what the budgets have indicated. The military isn’t interested in pursuing this weapon anymore. They’re actively trying to replace it but also don’t want to give up the capability until it is fully replaced.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They might not.

          There’s been a couple cases where the US military has classified something so heavily that they needed to re-spend millions in R&D in order to learn how to make the material again.