• Womble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Microsoft has Windows Defender, its in-house alternative to CrowdStrike, but because of the 2009 agreement made to avoid a European competition investigation, had allowed multiple security providers to install software at the kernel level.

    Its all the EU’s fault for having the temerity to think users should be able to control their own hardware instead of us!

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    If a EU regulation was at fault, only systems in the EU should’ve been affected. There would be no reason to adhere to complicated EU rules everywhere else globally.

    This doesn’t add up. They need to find a more believable fall guy.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          So I don’t agree with this blame game, but in order to limit the scope of this to EU, they would have had to maintain two different designs, so it just makes sense to change the global design to suit the EU agreement. If it were something like bundling, then that’s light enough to maybe change regionally, but it’s too much to maintain a whole other kernel architecture.

          Happens all the time with regulations. For example my company doesn’t have different products to comply with different environmental regulations, they just compose the strictest superset of the international regulations and follow those. California passes a law and it may change the global strategy.

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They should, but then they’d be replaced by other US multinationals. So they won’t.

      The EU (and not just the EU by the way) loves US tech. It can’t get enough. They both play a cat and mouse game with each other for the public but the EU aren’t going to force MS out and MS aren’t going to leave.

      Put it another way, of the EU wanted to be principled and demand fairness for EU citizens they’d take away MS (and other US multinational’s) tax breaks via Dublin. But they’re not going to do that.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Put it another way, of the EU wanted to be principled and demand fairness for EU citizens they’d take away MS (and other US multinational’s) tax breaks via Dublin. But they’re not going to do that.

        The EU is literally doing that.

        • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Literally dragging their heels over this. The biggest opposition was from EU bloc nations.

          Now Ireland have eventually signed up to this but it’s a minimum threshold. i.e. they’re still highly comfortable about letting US multinational’s get away with complex tax arrangements in the EU to lower the amount they pay.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, it’s all the EU’s fault and not at all companies pushing updates whenever. “Here’s a new update, we’ll install and restart your PC. Fuck you”

    I know, it was a security update, patching a possible attack vector. I will take a very wild guess here and say that this has caused much more damage than what the update would ever protect from