• Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      The fruits of artistic labour.

      Ask any artist if they’d rather their work not be enjoyed at all, or enjoyed for free.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Typically it’s the fruits of distributing someone else’s artistic labor that are stolen not paid. The artists are under contract with the producers/distributors, so they get paid regardless (if we’re talking RIAA/MPAA/record labels/movie studios).

        Making a copy of something isn’t the same as stealing it. Making a copy of something and trying to pass it off as your own work is fraud, but that’s outside the scope of digital piracy. “Theft” requires that the stolen item is no longer in the possession of the original owner.

        • doodledup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          No. Almost all industries nowadays rely on IP. Nobody is manufacturing in Europe or US anymore. The most lucrative business of scale rely on software, logistics and other IP.

          Most people who do piracy don’t understand how their job also depends on IP in one way or the other. Their idealostic world view is incoherent. If you do privacy at least own up to it. You’re copying someone else’s work and there is no moral argument to do that in a non-socialist world.

          • Clent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            There was a time when the same could be said about slavery. People’s lives depended on slavery and they couldn’t imagine an economy without it and yet here we are.

            No one should own a person and no one should own an idea.