EDIT: For clarification, I feel that the current situation on the ground in the war (vs. say a year ago) might indicate that an attack on Russia might not result in instant nuclear war, which is what prompted my question. I am well aware of the “instant nuclear Armageddon” opinion.
Serious question. I don’t need to be called stupid. I realize nuclear war is bad. Thanks!
Russia has 5000 nukes, if the US is not involved, Europe will be toast
Even without US. UK has nukes, France has nukes. You don’t need a lot to destroy Russia. Basically just two.