• nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    4 months ago

    Either Google continually buys companies for far more than they should or they really suck at buisness. How many times have they aquired healthy companies then absolutely destroyed them? It’s hard for me to believe they’re not actively trying to at this point.

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The point is to exterminate them. To paraphrase another company, embrace, extend, extinguish.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        In this case it’s more if you can’t beat em buy em. But it’s from the same school of business.

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, if they are healthy companies they could snag some market share from one of Google’s products.

      Easier to kill them early.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It means you get to dismantle a competitor, while also retaining the employees otherwise best suited to create a new competitor.

    • TAG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would assume some of that is acqui-hiring. Google acquires a company and looks at which employees are the outstanding talent. The best employees are poached for projects Google cares about while the rest are left to keep the product going without the thought leaders who built it.

    • EddieTee77@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Between Fitbit and Nest, I don’t know how they can buy them and not just let them run separately like Waze. They have great brands that were ruined.

  • makyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s what Google does, launch products -> cancel them, buy products -> cancel them. I have been burned enough times by them that I don’t use anything they make anymore out of the certainty that it’ll get canceled just as soon as I’ve grown to depend on it.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I literally just bought a Fitbit because I really needed a watch and it has the features I cared about and was way less expensive than a Garmin.

    Honestly I think Google will cancel them because they compete with Android Wear or whatever which can’t hold a charge worth a damn. 24 hours for a Pixel Watch? Fuck right off.

    • manmachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      May I suggest Garmin? For a smartwatch they have decent battery life and tons of sport/fitness features.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        You must have missed my first statement? Unless you can justify $300-$400 more for the features I use in the Fitbit. Bonus points if you can make it into a funny song.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Another Garmin recommendation from me as well. They are built well, and not shitty with their apps.

        • subignition@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I dunno about iOS, but the reviews of the Garmin Connect app on the Play Store are… very consistently negative over the last handful of months. There was apparently a significant redesign that made a lot of information less accessible. I was thinking about getting one of their cheaper fitness trackers, but I’m less sure about that after seeing those reviews.

  • Cypher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    They don’t need to, the day the acquisition was announced my Fitbit went in the bin.

    Fuck google, the greedy rent seeking parasites.

    • Frank_B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I had no idea Fitbit sold to google, and had in the back of my mind to buy one eventually. Guess that’s not gonna happen, found any alternative?

      • QualifiedKitten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Garmin. You’ll probably spend a bit more on the hardware, but there’s nothing locked behind a subscription. I had the Fitbit Sense and switched to the Garmin Forerunner 265. If the skin temperature sensor is important to you, you’ll want a different model, but that’s the only thing I’ve noticed as missing so far.

        • benpetersen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve been loving the Venu 3s, it has quite good hardware for the price point. Battery lasts 5-7 days, depending on my activities. I got a 20% off coupon by signing up for an app and doing 2-3 surveys, I can’t remember the name but it’s mentioned quite a few times in the Garmin subreddit (sorry I know…). Also get a couple different 18mm bands (I like nato style or a silicone band) and maybe a screen protector since it’s a raised bezel it’s prone to contacting more things than recessed glass.

      • pound_heap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Garmin. Works reasonably well without connection to the phone. Some models supported by Gadgetbridge

        Edit: corrected app name

    • tamal3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      As soon as they require me to use a Google account I’ll get rid of mine, too. It’s coming soon.

  • Erasmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    Same thing happened to Nest. The cameras and thermostats were great when they were a private company then sh*t the bed when Google took them over.

    Google stopped support of their app almost immediately in support of ‘Google Home’ which was to control the thermostat and Camera - which is terrible and requires you to constantly log into it with your email and password if you want to access anything.

    • aport@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Google Home is the biggest piece of shit I’ve ever had the displeasure to use.

      It used to work really well, and now it’s trash. I don’t know how they could fuck something up so badly.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Home Assistant works well on a cheap(-ish) Raspberry Pi. They’re even working to get voice fully capable.

        It can be fully local and is FOSS, for those for whom that matters.

      • TehWorld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I went with the BezosBoxHomeAsssssistant. … it sucks too. The challenge to my mind is that it’s hard to make any profit on these things, so it’s hard to spend the dev and server $$$ required to actually make the systems do what they should.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think I’ve ever had to log into the Google Home app, it just uses the accounts on my phone. Or is this some sort of situation where, “I’m too Android to understand this problem?”

      • subignition@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Having your Google Accounts linked to your phone is the same as being logged into them at all times. I believe the person you’re replying to might not use Google Account integration.

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m still wearing an OG Pebble (I’ve had about a dozen Pebbles total) . However, they’re starting to get more rare and expensive. Also, while I’m still on Android 12, I understand Android 14 can break the app.

      • TehWorld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I had two Pebble Steel watches. One just up and died one day and the other slowly failed as the buttons stopped working. I knew it was fixable, but with the sale to Fitbit happening, I Switched to AppleWatch. I do miss some things (battery life!) but all in all I’m not unhappy with my Apple Watch.

  • rxbudian@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Glad I moved to Garmin a while back. I preferred Fitbit’s Dashboard over Garmin
    When I heard Google’s buying it, I got a Garmin for my next smartwatch just to check the UI. I was thinking of moving back, but I guess I won’t.
    Garmin seems to be embracing smartwatches with a number of different series

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Garmin watches are now increasingly supported by GadgetBridge too, so you can have a fully offline setup.

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Basically, gadgetbridge is a third party open-source application that replaces the manufacturer app for a bunch of fitness watches (and other devices of that kind).

          So you can use it to replace the phone connectivity functions (like receiving notifications etc) as well as getting visualisations of the data etc. And since it all happens locally, none of your data is stored on the manufacturer’s servers. If you understand how to work with SQL and statistics, you can also run your own statistical analyses, since it’s just a sqlite DB.

          The downside is that you can expect it to be limited in functionality compared to e.g. Garmin’s cloud functionality. Personally I find there’s enough data to be useful, but other’s might have different needs.

            • vividspecter@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Not at exactly the same time since the app and watch communicate over Bluetooth. You should be able to pair and repair between the apps, but I haven’t tested it myself.

        • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          https://gadgetbridge.org

          Gadgetbridge is a free and open source Android application that allows you to pair and manage various gadgets such as smart watches, bands, headphones, and more without the need for the vendor application. So in short, you can use Gadgetbridge instead of relying on your gadget’s own proprietary app.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Great to see all the Garmin love, I’ll have a look.

      Just got an ancient Garmin standalone GPS from the thrift store. Soldered a new battery in and it’s GTG. Even with zero updates, the quality is top notch. One example; It’s been untouched and turned on in my hiking pack for over a month. Battery is full hot!

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    The year is 2039.

    After successful launch of AILook replacement NextAI, Google is discontinuing traditional Google Search.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thankful for my first-generation ANCIENT Apple Watch. It needs to be charged every night and the UI is a bit sluggish, but it’s still kickin! Still does everything I want it to (legitimately just activity tracking and reading texts)

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, and as if anyone would know. They’ll send out the announcement internally on the Tuesday before the next fitbit releases, then announce it to the public on Wednesday.

  • TheHottub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s like when you stop hanging out with your girlfriend in hopes she breaks up with you. Technically you didn’t break up with her.

  • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s a damn shame they won’t drop Chrome like they do most things. I can dream, I suppose.

  • TheHottub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    They destroyed Fitbit. It was just to kill competitors. I’ve had so many issues with Google hardware it’s insane.