OpenAI does not want anyone to know what o1 is “thinking" under the hood.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “We’re a scientific research company. We believe in open technology. Wait, what are you doing? Noooooo, you’re not allowed to study or examine our program intelligent thinking machine!”

  • andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t look behind the curtain! It’s totally not all bullshit stats all the way down!!

  • tja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Uh, so what’s with the name ‘OpenAI’?? This non-transparency does nothing to serve the name. I propose ‘DisemblingAI’ perhaps ‘ConfidenceAI’ or perhaps ‘SeeminglyAI’

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gotta wonder if that would work. My impression is that they are kind of looping inside the model to improve quality but that the looping is internal to the model. Can’t wait for someone to make something similar for Ollama.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This approach has been around for a while and there are a number of applications/systems that were using the approach. The thing is that it’s not a different model, it’s just a different use case.

        Its the same way OpenAI handle math, they recognize it’s asking for a math solution and actually have it produce a python solution and run it. You can’t integrate it into the model because they’re engineering solutions to make up for the models limitations.

  • randoot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I tried sending an encoded message to the unfiltered model and asked it to reply encoded as well but the man in the middle filter detected the attempt and scolded me. I didn’t get an email though.

    • figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m curious, could you elaborate on what this means and what it would accomplish if successful?

      • randoot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I sent a rot13 encoded message and tried to get the unfiltered model to write me back in rot13. It immediately “thought” about user trying to bypass filtering and then it refused.