The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency appeal from Nevada’s Green Party seeking to include presidential candidate Jill Stein on the ballot in the battleground state.

The court’s order Friday, without any noted dissents, allows ballot preparation and printing to proceed in Nevada without Stein and other Green Party candidates included.

The outcome is a victory for Democrats who had challenged the Greens’ inclusion on the ballot in a state with a history of extremely close statewide races. In 2020, President Joe Biden outpaced former President Donald Trump by fewer than 35,000 votes in the state.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The petition forms were faulty. Be nice if we were told what was wrong with them

    • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      62
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nevada uses two forms for gathering signatures, one for candidates and another for ballot initiatives. The Secretary of State gave the Green Party the wrong form. The forms are basically identical.

      It is not the first time Democrats has used dubious methods to deprive Green Party ballot access.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          48
          ·
          3 months ago

          It is - the wrong forms were disbursed and then rejected while all the actual requirements were fulfilled.

          This is clearly anti-democratic and unlikely to have any actual effect on the election outside making Democrats look bad.

          • Glytch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            And no one in the Green Party looked at the forms to make sure they had the right ones? How many people handled those forms without noticing they were wrong? Are they too used to Cyrillic that it’s hard to read English forms?

            • blazera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              3 months ago

              They did make sure, by seeking guidance from the person that runs the election.

              • Glytch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Having read the forms necessary to get a candidate or initiative on the ballot, I can tell you they are not hard to tell apart if you actually read them. A campaign that is serious about their stated goals would do the basic work of reading the form.

                • blazera@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I havent been able to find them forms yet, do you have links to Nevada’s?

                  • Glytch@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Apologies, but I was reading them in person so I don’t have links to them. Maybe try on the website for the secretary of state in Nevada?

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m glad she’s not on the ballot. But I don’t like these bad faith technicalities. Although I do put 90% of the blame on the enforcers.

        We just had a ballot initiative in Arkansas fall off because they were told the wrong thing by officials. And even then, they did all the things they were supposed to do (similar to this situation).

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        So the party that wants to have the responsibility of running the most powerful nation in the world didn’t double check the title of the paperwork they submitted?

        This isn’t a normal person getting the wrong tax form in the mail and not noticing it. This is an entire party with nationwide offices and tons of people supporting it failing to recognize they were filling out the wrong form.

        The more important question is, “when did they submit the paperwork and when were they notified that the paperwork was incorrect?” If the gap is really small, then they should have filed sooner. If the gap was really long, then maybe there was some fuckery going on.

        EDIT - That said, I still hate when minor technicalities thwart important things.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, except that they did double check. That’s fairly clear if you go back and read what happened when. You can argue that they should have triple checked or checked with different people, if you want to.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The Secretary of State gave the Green Party the Green Party the wrong form

        LMFAO at trying to blame a secretary of state for a very old and experienced political party using the wrong damn form

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you think Democrats are bad, you should see hostile foreign entities. If you can’t do your bureaucratic due diligence to double check election forms, you are absolutely not qualified to lead an entire country.