some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.world · 2 days agoOpenAI is now valued at $157 billionarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up1329arrow-down132file-text
arrow-up1297arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI is now valued at $157 billionarstechnica.comsome_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square129fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down18·2 days ago Computers might be good at numbers and typesetting, but we’ll always need human secretaries and phone operators to keep things running. They might be able to beat a novice, but no computer will ever beat a human grandmaster at chess. Okay, then they can’t beat humans at Go or poker. Any non-trivial task requiring creativity and understanding is beyond these tools. ← you are here AI-run corporations will never be able to outcompete ones with ones with human boards and CEOs. An AI scriptwriter could never win an Oscar. I’m voting for the human candidate for president, I don’t think the AI one is up to the task.
minus-squareaesthelete@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoThe future portion of this list reads like something produced from ChatGPT.
minus-squareMadrigal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down4·2 days agoGood one. Did you use an LLM to generate it?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down10·2 days agoToo good for a human to have written so it must have been AI? I guess I’ll take it as a compliment that I’m writing at that level.
minus-squarevaultdweller013@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 day agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarebestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoI would argue that there’s neither understanding nor creativity happening. It’s guessing, aping, remixing, which is impressive enough. It’s a machine that knows everything, but understands nothing.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·2 days agoAnd yet it’s accomplishing those tasks. I guess that means “understanding” wasn’t necessary for them after all.
minus-squareShiggles@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoThe point isn’t that we’ll never get there. The point is we sure as shit aren’t there yet.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days ago I’m voting for the human candidate for president, I don’t think the AI one is up to the task. Don’t blame me, I voted for Kodos_bot
The future portion of this list reads like something produced from ChatGPT.
Good one. Did you use an LLM to generate it?
Too good for a human to have written so it must have been AI? I guess I’ll take it as a compliment that I’m writing at that level.
Removed by mod
No…?
I would argue that there’s neither understanding nor creativity happening. It’s guessing, aping, remixing, which is impressive enough.
It’s a machine that knows everything, but understands nothing.
And yet it’s accomplishing those tasks. I guess that means “understanding” wasn’t necessary for them after all.
The point isn’t that we’ll never get there. The point is we sure as shit aren’t there yet.
Don’t blame me, I voted for Kodos_bot
deleted by creator