• haywire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Didn’t The Incredibles have a backstory like that where supes are basically illegal after they caused too much collateral damage?

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mr. Incredible is sued for stopping a man’s suicide and injuring him instead.

      In a Disney film.

      This is explicitly stated, to the camera, within the first 5 minutes.

      Holy shit Disney, you hadn’t “Up’d” us yet, chill

      • fishpen0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The first Incredibles movie was released two years before Pixar was bought by Disney

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Pixar wasn’t owned by them, but they were contractually obligated to be making movies for and with Disney

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s also got some somewhat overt Objectivist messaging? Syndrome’s line: “when everyone is super, no one will be.” is fascinating.

        Like, you can make an argument that a major message of the film is that some people are born special and more capable than others, and should be alotted special privileges. Syndrome isn’t one of the golden few, and rather than accept that, he attempts to democratize super powers to some extent (although because he’s the bad guy, part of his plan is making money from this).

        I love the film, I just get some odd vibes from it at times.