• ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Sometimes I back up my argument with entire books lmao. Its not usually for the person I am arguing with. Its for the people who see the argument and are curious

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You should be able to explicate your own argument, though. “Read this book” isn’t convincing on its own.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, this happens way too often “it’s all in here (link), but I will not elaborate”

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah, you need to take specific portions of the book to support your argument. I won’t just say “read Fanon” but will give a a specific example from the book in addition to the more general example of the entire work, plus encourage them to read more.