• Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a numbers game. There are WAY more Jewish people in the US than there are Arabs (~7.5 vs 3.5 million, according to a quick Google search).

    Strategically, those Jewish voters are also more likely to switch to a Republican vote than the Arabs, regardless. It would take 2 Arabs (or any other Democratic voter) sitting out to counter a single Democratic voter switching to a Republican vote.

    Granted, none of this accounts for voter locations (because only the 7 swing states matter), voter enthusiasm, claims of national security, or (most importantly of all) ethics.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Everything can be justified in this way.

      “Adolf Hitler identified he needed to blame all problems on Jews. And systematically put them in concentration camps. This was a political move necessary to advance his career and appeal to voters.”

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be clear, at no point was I trying to justify any actions. My only goal was to explain the strategic path that would lead to it. And of course there are additional nuances, which I alluded to at the end.

        Besides, a winning strategy is not an indicator of ethics.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      People are downvoting you because they don’t like the outcome, not because they disagree with your argument.