• tronx4002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I am suprised to see all the negativity. I for one think this is awesome and would love to see SMRs become more mainstream.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I agree, and it is possibly the only good thing to come out of AI.
      Like people asking “why do we need to go to the moon?!”.

      Fly-by-wire (ie pilot controls decoupled from physical actuators), so modern air travel.

      Integrated circuits (IE multiple transistors - and other components - in the same silicon package). Basically miniaturisation and reduction in power consumption of computers.

      GPS. The Apollo missions lead to the rocket tech/science for geosynchronous orbits require for GPS.


      This time it is commercial.
      I’d rather the power requirements were covered by non-carbon sources. However it proves the tech for future use.

      For a similar example, I have a strong dislike of Elon Musk. He has ruined the potential of Twitter and Tesla, but SpaceX has had some impressive accomplishments.

      Google are a shitty company. I wish the nuclear power went towards shutting down carbon power.
      But SOMEONE has to take the risk. I wish that someone was a government. But it’s Google. So… Kind of a win?