Yall didn’t like my earlier fluff, lets try an actual fluff article this time. I do realize its just rehashing more bullshit, but activity is good, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fake_news_websites
Literally fake news.
Literally not in that list.
Obviously it’s been edited in the weeks since I’ve posted that.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1170328667
Feel free to read more about it: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/slay-news-bias-and-credibility/
Damn, reading trough the edits and who places them just shows how terrible wikipedia is. The worst part is that they have millions to spare every year but decide not to hire people to do things properly
It’s under attack by a major disinformation movement right now. Fascists gonna fasc.
That, and also management getting rich of off donation money
We get it. Everything that goes against your narrative is fake news.
Maybe so, but you’re going to have to do better than Wikipedia citing USA Today to make a compelling case for it.
Ah yes, Slay News, the most reputable news source in America.
Slay News is an independent media outlet providing truthful reporting and the free and open exchange of ideas. Slay News is unapologetically pro-America and pro-free speech and stands by a pledge to put our people before corporate interests or political agenda.
The forensic team that produced these results seems like less of an objective 3rd party and more of a laboratory that tries to use “science” to help their customers reach a certain conclusion. If you watch as much murder porn as I do (Dateline, etc) you’ll know that it’s not that hard to find experts that can come to a completely opposite conclusion from the prosecution.
That alone doesn’t invalidate their assertions but you should know they’re most definitely starting with massive fraud as the conclusion and working backwards to support that conclusion. For one, referring to missing paperwork, paperwork that most counties probably don’t keep very long, as evidence of fraud.
Removed by mod
