• catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      89
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean, I can count how many times I’ve thought “damn I wish I still had wired headphones” on zero hands.

      • OnfireNFS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’ve never really understood the argument against headphone jacks. I can still use Bluetooth headphones with my phone. I can also use wired headphones and aux cables on my phone. Why would you want less features

        • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’d be fine if they gave us another USB C port, but inability to listen and charge the phone at the same time without using Bluetooth (which also needs to be charged) grinds my gears.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’m not arguing against it, just not particularly arguing for it. Out of all the removed features, I’d want the IR blaster back. I can’t do that with Bluetooth.

      • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Must be nice to either accept the objectively worse sound quality of wireless headphones, or be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price and just not care about it getting stolen.

        • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          8 days ago

          I care a moderate amount about audio quality, but my bigger gripes with Bluetooth generally involve the latency and inconvenience of switching devices (even with multipoint).

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          IDK about you, but in the environments where I’d use headphones with my phone are not environments where I’m capable of noticing the audio difference between bluetooth and wired.

          Ten times is an extreme exaggeration unless you’re really at the bottom end of earbuds. Decent quality bluetooth headphones aren’t that much more expensive.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          If I cared that much about audio quality, I wouldn’t be listening to music on my phone anyway.

          I’m not sure which product you’re referring to that’s ten times the price. You can get quality monitors for around $200. I don’t know of any Bluetooth headphones that are going to match that quality at any price, but you can get close enough for the majority of purposes in the same price range. The biggest issue will be the Bluetooth audio codec and the wireless link itself (signal strength and latency), not the sound reproduction quality.

              • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                8 days ago

                If you going to complain about that, never listen to a CD or any other digital format. Let me guess, only vinyl is pure?

                • catloaf@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I’m not the one complaining about it, hence the “if” in my previous comment.

        • bjorney@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price

          Or maybe just go buy a $5 adapter so you can use your wired headphones

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          7 days ago

          FYI “to each their own” was a phrase used on the entrance of a nazi concentration camp, same as “work sets you free”. Might wanna avoid that phrase in the future

          • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            7 days ago

            Makes no sense. Using a commonly used phrase has nothing to do with Nazis in almost any context despite the origin. No need to start making a list of things to change because of an old connection to something bad.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I dunno, how about the horrible privacy practices of most cars nowadays? Bluetooth allows connection, sure. It also allows data to go between the device and the car. An aux jack can’t do that.

        • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          An aux jack can’t do that.

          Really? Because there are aux jacks that allow for voice and volume control. Seems to me like they could make one for “real data”.

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Well, if they can, that’s interesting. But the method used to control volume and a mic are a hell of a lot simpler than transferring data. You’d need an expanded jack with extra circuitry afaik.

            At that point, you’re over to a usb cable, which is where all this starts.

            • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              I mean, it’s all just electrical signals. They could simplify the data for such a transfer. The volume and mic do have an extra wire or two in them, but those are still made no bigger than those without, and the jack just has an extra ring or two on it for the connection. Most everybody is oblivious to the presence of those rings. So, I would say it’s totally possible, but is it worth it money-and-effort-wise?

              • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 days ago

                Well, there’s a difference between analog and digital. So, no matter how you cut it, if the aux jack is there, making it do double duty is essentially turning it into a usb port.

                You can’t really send much data at any kind of useful speed over the size and types of wiring in even the more complicated headphone wires, which usually aren’t even present in an actual aux cord that’s got a plug on each end.

                The level of data transfer over Bluetooth is both higher, and is already set up to move data like the cars nowadays scrape.

                So, while it would conceivably be possible to make new aux cords that are beefed up to do it, and make the jacks in both phones/tablets and head units interpret the signals, it isn’t so much whether or not it’s worth it money wise, it’s will the car owners and passengers buy it?

                The connectors, as is, have a limited number of connections, poles. To change that, you have to make the plugs and jacks bigger, or radically redesign them.

                From a “worth it” standpoint, they’re already taking the cheaper way out of trying to force everyone to use the Bluetooth that’s already built in. Get device makers to stop having jacks, stop putting them in cars, and the problem is solved on their end. It then falls to the consumer to find a way around that.

      • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.idM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        To be honest, I’ve used Bluetooth headphones before Android was even a thing (stupid W850i proprietary ports and all) and love them.

        However, dickhead here just put my Soundcore buds through the wash so there is argument for me having a backup which this Poco F6 is now lacking.

        It’s a silly divisive topic IMO which is never gonna be solved when blog authors put out articles like the above.

        :(