The article seems to be shittily written in my opinion but I figure if you watch the video (about a minute) it will get the point across.

My question lies in, do you think this will benefit the health of the people moving forward, or do you fear it being weaponized to endorse or threaten companies to comply with the mention of Kennedy being tied to its future as mentioned in the end of the article

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Thanks for posting that. Honestly I would almost guess the article was compiled by AI, as it seems to assume you know information it has not previously mentioned.

      If you notice it mentions the symbol multiple times but never shows it. (Not a symbol it can type) Where as a human would have written/drawn/ known it has to be shown or none of the references make sense.

      Or I’m an idiot and they just are saying the term “healthy” is the symbol they are going to use?

          • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, it’s gonna be some kind of logo that can be used on labels. Like I said, it’s under development currently. What it will look like, nobody is quite sure, in the article. I read mentioned that some critics believe it will oversimplify the matter of buying healthy food, and that it should be more like a label That has some kind of explanation.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    And it will get reversed in a month…already heard Trumpicans calling it “woke”.

      • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        First, they came for frogs and made them gay, and I didn’t speak up for I’m not a frog.

        Then they came for my fats and made them trans.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ooh ohh, let me play ….

          I didn’t speak up because I’m not a French fry

          Then they came for my weekly paycheck and made it bi

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I just don’t put fats on any sort of pedestal.

        They’re just part of cooking, a means to an end. Excess is the enemy of any form of health, just have a balance.

        No steak cooked in butter will be healthier than broccoli boiled in it.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sorry, trail mix isn’t healthy.

      And saturated fats can be. The whole thing against sat fats is wrong, and was proven so by 1994.

      The FDA is full of shit on this.

      • Supermariofan67@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Saturated fats are not good actually. That’s a lie funded by dairy industry.

        And trail mix (with nuts and whole grains and fruit) is in fact healthy.

        The overwhelming majority of Americans eat nowhere close to the bare minimum recommended amount of fiber. Guess which one has lots of fiber? And is also full of minerals not found in many other foods

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yet there is evidence to suggest dairy fat has a different effect than other animal derived fats, and there is certainly plausible deniability.

          This this may be big dairy propaganda, the overriding fact is that every time we’ve been wrong with the health impact of fats, it’s been treating them as if they were one thing with one effect. Fats are a huge family of chemicals that are both necessary for life and have both positive and negative effects in quantity. It’s always more complex than we think, and studies of eating habits in humans over long periods are next to impossible.

          First they were calorie dense and I was fat …. But fats are a basic building block for my entire body and help me feel full. Then they raised cholesterol, but some lowered cholesterol ….

          • Supermariofan67@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            It has no fiber at all. No animal products contain any dietary fiber. Dietary fiber is by definition cellulose and other non-digestible starches found in plant material.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        They’ve always been behind the times. If you’re old enough you’ll remember the cholesterol scare. They apparently hadn’t learned the different types of cholesterol yet. This is from my youth.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not really.

    If you cook from ingredients, you’ll usually be reasonably healthy. It’s not impossible to make healthy prepared foods, but it’s (comparatively) expensive enough that that, not awareness, is the main limitation.

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      It is harder to cook healthy foods nowadays than it was even 40 years ago because commercial farming has expedited the growth cycles of plants and animals to the point where they simply cannot process the nutrition available from the environment the way that they used to.

      If you want to eat truly healthy, you basically have to grow the food yourself.

      Since that is completely unreasonable for the grand majority of the modern world, your goal should be to try to eat as healthily as you can. Cooking from scratch and not over cooking your food are very good places to start.

      • madthumbs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I used to believe all that kind of stuff. Our diets are so much more diverse and food more available than ever. We have fresh produce in the winter, and our meat is farmed instead of scarce and hunted. We understand things like needing vitamin C daily, either fortifying rice or not killing / stripping the b-vitamins on it. We can get far more nutrients than we need from food which is why people can eat so many empty calories and be fine.

        -Was sick for years and in a lot of pain because of silicon dioxide (an additive commonly found in vitamins).

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I won’t debate this point either way. There are definitely ranges to quality, and I haven’t see bona fide research on the impact of factory farming and limited strains vs whatever else.

        Also, processed doesn’t automatically mean unhealthy. It more just enables incredibly unhealthy things to be done either as preservatives or to cut costs.

        But the biggest impact on health is from the ready, cheap availability of low quality, high calorie food that is actively optimized for overconsumption, and the fact that frozen prepared foods (and fast food) that are affordable are generally not very healthy because of cost cutting. So that’s the best point of emphasis to be healthier.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is a good try, but no I don’t see it helping. Those of us who can afford healthier choices already do so.

    My simplification is that most people fall into one of these scenarios

    • just need the cheapest, possibly emphasize comfort food - doesn’t matter what’s healthy if it’s not in your budget
    • proportions and quantity. This won’t help
    • prepared food, whether frozen or restaurant, is a disaster.

    I fall in to the second camp. I generally know what’s healthy and try to get it, but I don’t succeed with portion control or proportions. If the wrong things still dominate your plate, and your plate is too full, it doesn’t matter if some things have a healthy symbol.

    I have no idea how to fix people like me, but for the first scenario I really believe we need a financial incentive. Back in the old days you ate a lot of vegetables because what came out of your garden was the cheapest food. Now thanks partly to government subsidies, corn syrup is both the cheapest food, and appeals to our evolutionary desire for sweetness. Let’s start by redirecting those subsidies to support a healthier food supply, but yeah I think we’re going to need a vice tax

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago
      • proportions and quantity. This won’t help

      If we use less high-fructose corn syrup then it will help since fructose delays your body’s feeling of satiation.

    • BangCrash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree with most of your post except the the first 2 sentences.

      We don’t know what we don’t know. You assume we already know what the healthy options are. But with 50 years of education propping up a food pyramid that was developed as a marketing tool by kellogs we don’t actually know what’s best for us.

      We think grains & cereals are the best. These along with sugars have the highest caloric value. It makes absolute sense to eat these if food is scarce and difficult to get as they provide the best bang for buck.

      But in modern society where food is easy to get grains and carbs aren’t good.

      So reeducating everyone using the understanding science has developed oner the last 50 yrs is hugely important. We’ve been feeding ourselves based on misinformation.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        So are my cheerios healthy? They not only make that claim on the box but I was raised with that knowledge all my life, as were my parents. And it is oats, and does have what used to be a decent amount of fiber. And I eat it with yogurt and fruit. Yet it’s another carb, and has much less fiber, vitamins, protein than many modern breakfast cereal.

        Are my eggs healthy? Or do they raise cholesterol? Or am I likely to cook them with less healthy choices? Is my toast more carbs than cereal or less? More fiber or less? Is butter bad or good this week? What if I pair with sausage or bacon?

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not subsidizing corn would be a good start. Why is HFCS shit cheaper than vegetables? Rhetorical question.

    • Anticorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      Fat is a necessary macro, and the public’s ignorant obsession with fat-free is crazy, especially since it almost always corresponds with more sugar, like you said. Guess what the body turns sugar into.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Less sauce. But I’ve cut out roux based sauces, except occasionally. And occasionally I will use half and half for coffee and tea. Moderation in all things, including moderation. Also I do much less bread, mainly because proper flour in a food dessert desert is not easy to get, and store bought bread in the USA is gross.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Ah, I just clicked the copy button as I thought it was one of the communities that required the title to match the articles title. (Jerboa doesn’t show community rules on the side). Sorry about that

      Edit: done

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I know I’m an awful pedant who doesn’t wurd gud either half the time, but you meant to say populace not populous in the title. Hope you don’t mind me pointing it out :-)

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Haha thanks. Nah I added that part in to make it fit the community rules I violated by accident. Thanks for the heads up.

          Constructive critiques are always good in my book. (Wish I always kept that demeanor)