• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 天前

    That’s like saying “the problem with cancer isn’t the unrestrained tumor growth, it’s the depletion of resources for the rest of the body”—the two go hand in hand.

  • NONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Español
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    It’s both, pal. Both are bad, 'cause the former enables the later.

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 天前

    It’s both. The mere fact that there are people with billions of dollars to throw around means a large amount of the world’s productive capacity is spent catering to the whims of billionaires when it could instead be spent on useful things for ordinary people. And because money is inseparable from politics, billionaires can more or less directly bend government policies to their will, greatly hindering anyone else from having a real say in government policy.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 天前

      If the needs and desires of the many were satiated and society was arranged to prioritize each individuals well being/contentedness it wouldn’t matter if one individual had more.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 天前

        That’s a really big “if”, especially when you consider how billionaires actively use their influence to maintain an underclass by fighting against government policies that would help lower-class people become middle-class.

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 天前

          use their influence to maintain an underclass by fighting against government policies that would help lower-class people become middle-class.

          See deprive people of their health and livelihood

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 天前

    in my head these are the same things but im glad you were able to arrive at this conclusion nevertheless

  • LifeLemons@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 天前

    Billionaires are billionaires because there are few who are billionaires. If everyone was a billionaire then nobody would see billionaires in awe but would see billion billionaires in awe. This is just a consequence of our social behaviour as being different always has a different response.

    What I am saying is, billionaires are billionaires because not everyone is a billionaire and everyone is low compared to them.

    !Note: I am not talking about “depriving people” topic. That’s different. !<