• sepi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      x86 is already dead yo

      edit: downvoters don’t understand they are using amd64 and not x86 lol wtf

      edit 2: downvoters of this comment are computer-illiterate

      • ralakus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        x86 is the architecture, amd64 is an extention on that architecture so it’s still x86 just with an instruction set extension that allows for native 64 bit computing.

        x86 was designed to be nearly fully backwards compatible back to the i386 or even the 8086 so whatever code that could run on those CPUs would work on modern “amd64” CPUs.

        Pretty much x86 is a snowball rolling down a hill. It keeps picking up new things and growing as time goes on but the core of it will always be the same.

        • sepi@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          17 days ago

          What are you smoking? x86 has been gone for years. Y’all are using amd64.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            It’s always amusing when someone thinks they know something, then aggressively tells others, only to be wrong.

            amd64, also known as x86_64 is an extension to x86. It’s still x86 in the same way a car is still a car even if you bolt a trailer onto it.

      • 4grams@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        good point. It still makes me smile how that one went down. imagine if we were all on f’ing itanium instead.