• nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    4 days ago

    The funny thing is using a good adblocker and I haven’t noticed a single youtube ad, so if they’re to blame, they’re also the solution. I don’t see how this move functionally does anything other than punish those who can’t block ads.

      • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 days ago

        People that know what ad blockers are frequently use them. The act of punishing the group that isn’t aware of adblockers simply will drive more users to discover/make use of them.

        • Rooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Remember those unskippable anti-piracy DVD ads that only paying customers saw? The media industry has learned jack shit during the last 30 years.

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          “We have to punish you because of what those other people are doing to legitimately evade punishment” is only a useful argument if the punished group can somehow cover for those not affected.

          • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Exactly. It’s a tired argument that’s been made in a lot of different mediums. It’s not worked in any of them.