And by your logic, cigarette ads should be on full display again because the ultimate responsibility lies on the parent and cigarette company shouldn’t be held liable for the addiction.

And no, you even get my logic wrong.

You can’t, but i can. They are multibillion dollar company, their app sole purpose is to serve user similar content based on watch history, they have a report button, they have the budget to hire, they have the resource to review, it’s their platform, they have to self regulate, and not extracting resource then wipe their hand clean without bearing any negative consequences. If they can’t, then the government should.

You can’t just show kids how fun gambling is then say you’re not responsible on these kids getting addicted after watching you. Tiktoker lies a lot to get the result they want, and they always leave out the danger of doing what they did. If bytedance did not regulate these content then they should get the axe, no one should get away scott free.

This doesn’t seems like they trying to be reasonable, it seems like they want to ban it but with extra step.

Also, no, this is very different. Thing spread slowly pre-internet, tiktok spread like wild fire in drought month. There’s different level of alertness needed to handle both cases, and tiktok themselves need to self-regulate, they can’t just wave their responsibility away because “dangerous challenge occur without us before”.

Plot twist: they now get Ukrainian actor to act as russian spy.

Idk what funnier, ads about truck in fuckcars, ads about truck in a post about hitting others with car, or ads about the truck brand Ram in a post about ramming others and walk free.

Yeah, Adam did say they would never have the same opportunity today than they have in 2003, the landscape of edutainment show is just too different today.

The list will be long, and some item will be contradicting.

!aneurysmposting@sopuli.xyz

I think it’s called Uber.

Why would i engage on deflection? You’re not even trying to proof the finding wrong, merely justifying the reason, which is admitting human right violation indeed happened within China. And i have no desire to impress anyone from this instance.

So far it’s just deflecting and deflecting. Why not just straight away and tell me you don’t have any evidence to proof that China didn’t do what they got accused of? Might save us some time going back and forth.

If you actually went to Xinjiang and asked the Uyghur people themselves

When a country have such an abysmal score on human right and freedom of express, i’d take whatever people inside China said with a huge spoon of salt, as well as any country official that took the guided tour of the region. I’m not sure who will answer no when asked about whether they’re happy with no violence occuring, but i bet you can ask Israeli the same exact question before 7th oct and they will be happy that Palestinian are being kept in such way that violate the human right.

the UN put this to issue to bed two years ago

Refused to talk is put the issue to bed? Isn’t this like when US veto-ed all those ceasefire talk about Israel genocide?

I’m pretty sure if the same thing happened to ethnic minority in the US for the same reason, you will be up in arm against it. But sure, you do you.

Also yet to refute UN’s claim.

Lot of link, none of it seems to disprove the report UN released, most seems to claim that US use this issue as their advantage, and one even justify it with the same universally panned excuse US used to invade the middle east.

Seriously.

Removed by mod

So you’re saying UN report is lying then? or is it because it’s not genocide yet, but human right violation that could be amount to crime against humanity?

Does that mean UN’s opinion of Israel is unfounded as well?

What can european public do to prevent trump from represent…them?

This and the “lefties” increasingly calling for another insurrection. Definitely a lot of foreign state actor influencing the emotion right now.

Yep, but should they provoke the palestinian community oversea, they deserved to be hated.