It’s not the only thing. But you can bet that the 10/10 reparability score on ifixit is not an accident.
It’s great that other companies are sourcing their materials fairly, but if I have to toss the device after three years because the battery is dead and I can’t swap it, or because the screen cracks, the speaker died or whatever, I’ll take that with a grain of salt.
Unless it has comparable reparability it can hardly be considered an “answer to the Fairphone”
Can’t have been too difficult, since America effectively stopped dead in its tracks.
So does Linux 🤷 And that comes with a bunch of other advantages.
So you’re saying it hasn’t been a month since it got cracked?
Seems to be roughly on par with the RX 6800, according to user benchmarks.com, so everything after should be an improvement. The -XT models are generally stronger. Also, in an attempt to adapt their naming schema to nvidia’s amd’s 7900 series was succeeded by the 90xx series.
Generally speaking nvidia seems to have the edge in ray-tracing, while amd offers faster rasterisation.
Why would anyone buy nvidia at this point?
Sadly, AMD’s Linux drivers are notorious for having trouble adjusting the clock speed. You may need to manually set the card to the highest speed before starting the test.
Yea, obviously the issue is that people don’t have time to go shopping… 🙄
I’m frequently amazed by the things conservatives don’t put together.
Assuming this is a genuine question and not just trolling.
Python’s main feature, IMO, is that it’s easy to pick up. You don’t need to remember to put a semicolon after nearly every line, so you don’t need to remember which lines don’t need it. Basically you only need to remember to put a colon before an indented block.
Thanks to significant whitespace even bad code will be moderately legible.
Control flow and loops are basically written in plain English: for i in range(17): as opposed to e.g. for (int i=0; i<17; i++) {.
This all reduces the mental load and thus leaves you with more capacity to focus on the task you’re trying to solve.
It’s a great language to give to your mathematicians, data scientists and other people with rudimentary programming knowledge at best.
As for the performance: interpreted languages are inherently slower than compiled ones. You don’t get a speed boost from first asking a separate program to translate the next line of code into a machine readable format before executing it. Just like you don’t get a speed boost from executing all your code in a virtual machine. Looking at you, Java.
But you don’t use python for the compute-heavy tasks. You use it for the plumbing in between and outsource the computation to a native library with python bindings, like NumPy, Pandas, PyTorch, etc. Horses for courses.
I can recommend Split Fiction wholeheartedly. Played it through with my wife and once more with a friend. Very enjoyable and introduced some very interesting mechanics revolving around the split screen.
Currently playing Schrödinger’s Cat Burglar, a light platform puzzler, with my wife.
Dude outsourced thinking so far he had to reinvent it.
Wonder if they like cocktails.
So it’s more of an electoral puppet show?
Did you vote for an oligarch?
Wow, I could get that thing I don’t care for by paying for that other thing I don’t care for. What a great deal.
It’s really set up for failure. It can only fall short of a deterministic, type-aware, contextual autocompletion, something IDEs have been supporting for like a decade.
At this point it might be quicker to make a list of updates that don’t break some essential functionality.