I have been told that in tropical places there is an abundance of food, so over there is ideal, but there’s also mosquitos and disease and it’s not an environment i’m familiar with.

Probably somewhere really remote but near to human settlement - easier to get casual work, hopefully?? Because less available workforce?

The sensible answer is probably "somewhere with good social safety net’ like The Neterpherlands or Sweden.

And if we think “wilderness survival” situation, the only answer for me would be somewhere temperate or sub arctic because those are the environments i’m familiar with; europe woukd be nice, but is there anywhere truly remote there?

That’s good to know, i always need more fun facts to say to people

Lol I think the downvotes show thst you’re definitely the best at appreciating this.

I think you’re right. Life is getting better, science and tech wise, but it might be getting stupider too (e.g managers jump the gun in firing someone because they assume a public LLM service will do the job just as well)

Have you seen that youtuber/tiktoker who has the pet pigeon? flatwavelength

Fun content.

When i hear about how usefuo they were in the past i’m always trying to re-domesticste them.

Fun pigeon fact: they can be trained to distinguish MRI scans of people with cancer from ones that don’t have cancer.

It’s fine. I might just be a broken person

Good one. I wanted to like fountain oens but i’m awful at using them. I can feel the ink on me now, in my memory

Think someone asked this before and the overwhelming evidence based answer was Sloths and/or Koalas because they have gross eating habits and sexual habits