That seems like a rather arbitrary measure. I could just as easily state “The state of the cereal aisle is the most reliable measure…”

Musk has already said he welcomes a chance to work in the Trump administration, so…

actions crimes

“FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT” really tones down the rhetoric, doesn’t it? I’m not one for conspiracy theories, but if ANYBODY could be base enough to nick their own ear and hire one pawn to kill another in sacrifice, it’s this piece of satan’s taint.

And now I’m reading a computer’s version of a story describing how a computer wrote a story that should have been discarded.

What a day that was!

To be honest… that doesn’t sound like a heavy lift at all.

Doctor Who from Eccleston on. We missed much of it (including all of the Capaldi and Whitaker years) so it’s still new to us, and we’re catching up just in time for the new guy. I used to roll my eyes at folks who insisted Who was worth watching, but I was clearly wrong: It’s such a fun (and sometimes devastating) show. Loving it.

Ha ha. Yeah… funny. … gulp.

I believe my 1998 Kelty backpack, Leatherman PST II, 1990 Volvo 240 Wagon and Mohawk Royalex canoe will outlast us all.

Unless they’re apologizing for their failures or resigning in shame, why even include comments from politicians like Grassley and Nunn? They’ve already told us they’re not interested or involved in such matters.

Op-Ed’s are just that: Opinions and Editorials. In traditional print journalism, they usually included informed opinion pieces from the editor of the publication itself, or perhaps expert guest or syndicated columnists. Fringe opinions were only relegated to the “letters to the editor” public-forum subsections and not given much weight. Today it seems whoever types fastest gets the audience.