He knows. All they need is an excuse.

Well then I have bad news about dementia and habitual stimulant abuse…

I hope every day of his life is the new worst one.

Idk what it is about masculinity that loves submissive women

Here is an excellent book on the topic if you’re interested.

You bet!

Exposing the moral depravity of reactionaries is kind of a pet project of mine.

Abilene Texas is a wretched hive of Christian nationalism and reactionary entitlement.

I only drive out there because I have family there; my niece was a victim of another pedo pastor there.

I’m imagining a seedy nest of lechery; empty whisky bottles strewn haphazardly on every surface imaginable. Opening kitchen doors is a gamble, and snake eyes means you’ve put your hand in some unidentifiably pungent, sticky, or greasy substance.

A glassy-eyed Giuliani sits on the battered leather couch that’s stained with a decade of fluids and spirits— he has become a part of it, sinking into the foam and springs. The lawyers kick his dangling foot, and life flutters back into his limbs; he shakes off the headache that has followed him like a bloodhound throughout his adulthood, letting it settle to a throbbing pulse in the back of his head. Black bile seeps out of this psychic wound as he cries out to an indifferent universe, but only a feeble croak escapes his lips.

Why won’t they release the pics?!

No, I realized that after I wrote it and did the lazy thing and didn’t edit.

One billionaire is an excess.

One cannot earn that much money without exploiting workers.

Let’s do the IOC too.

Go away, you’re boring and predictable.

Go away, you’re boring and predictable.

Your surface-level understanding of political philosophy is matched only by your amateur legal credentials.

Gotta say: it’s hilarious how far you’ve gone to avoid answering a simple question that would expose the stupidity of your argument. So brave.

Now go away, you’re boring and predictable.

I have explained it; remember how you bravely avoided the question that would unequivocally prove your “principle” wrong?

And reactionary has a meaning; it’s very reactionary of you to try and redefine it exactly backwards.

You can try to reframe it, but the facts are clear.

Avoiding the question is it’s own cowardly answer.

Reactionaries always try to reframe things exactly backwards.

Do you think you should need to get permission to disconnect from the kidney machine? Or do you think that it’s your choice to share your body or not?

I know why you keep avoiding this question: it shows that you think your bodily autonomy is more important than a woman’s.

You can try to reframe the issue, but the facts are clear.

Leave it to reactionaries to confuse healthcare with genocide.

I’ve already told you that autonomous people should get to choose what to do with their bodies. That’s clearly not a value that you hold, and want to give a fetus extra rights above and beyond the person upon whose body they depend.

You wouldn’t need to give a reason to disconnect the person attached to you by the kidney; it’s your body to decide to share or not.

You can try to reframe the issue, but the facts are clear.

You can call abortion access a genocide, but that doesn’t make it true.

You can try to reframe the issue, as many reactionaries do, but you should be aware that the Nazis also restricted abortion for “aryans”:

A pregnancy must not be interrupted! Beware of advice and interventions from unqualified people!

It’s about controlling women for patriarchal purposes, and you’re helping that cause.

So… Not the same case as a fetus at all, right?

If you were hooked up to someone using your kidneys who then died, I bet you wouldn’t want the doctors to have to wait until you had complications from sepsis before disconnecting you.

Because that’s the analogous argument. You keep trying to reframe it, but we know what happens when you put these kinds of restrictions on abortion: women die.

You can pretend otherwise, but the facts are clear.

Are comatose people relying on somebody else’s organs who might die or suffer grievous injury to keep them alive?