Hm. I’d be interested in seeing anything backing that up. You’ve just broadly stated that “ineffective” tax policies don’t work well, and I feel that is sorta in the name. Is there any line of reasoning that would make “wealth taxes” ineffective?
Truthfully, it’s far from relevant that the kid is autistic.
If you drag a child by the ankle, especially as a teacher, you’re a 100% piece of shit.
I’m not sure who you mean is shilling for corporations, but that’s certainly not the vibe I got from most of this thread.
It would be nice to see corporate profits wiped, especially after so much price gouging we’ve had to endure.
But why do you think that gouging will stop?
Let’s imagine that it does hurt corporate profits first. Will they survive? Probably the big ones, might be a bit harder for little ones. So the world keeps turning, right? But like you said the end customer will eat some of the costs, so we agree that prices will go up in the end.
Where’s the upside? More money funneled into the government? Paid by the increased prices for the consumer, or some dips in corporate profits?
I’m not sure that’s a win for the consumer normies.
How far back in the day are you thinking? I’m pretty sure recreational drugs have been around for a long while.
I’m unfamiliar with the mineral rights treaty specifics, but I remember it being said that it was a pretty shite deal for Ukraine anyway, and that it likely wouldn’t have been signed anyway
I only went back to read the comment because you told me you upvoted it. I wanted to make sure it was worthy.
!it was!<
You just casually dropping in that 832 is divisible by 8 makes me feel as if there’s a small gap in our abilities to do mental math
I think one of the most common talking points against lab grown is that they are too perfect. “It’s the imperfections that are beautiful” or something like that.
not a typo
puplic
This amuses me
Curious as to why that would be the case. Unless people are starting videos, letting them buffer, then reloading and doing it again.
It should be the same amount of bandwidth, otherwise, right?
If that’s a joke, I don’t get it.
If that’s real, I don’t know why.
Help?
When you talk about a sample, what does that actually mean? Like I recognize that the frequency of oscillations will tell me the pitch of something, but how does that actually translate to a chunk of data that is useful?
You mention a sample being stored as a number, which makes sense, but how is that number utilized? Again assuming uncompressed, if my sample “value” comes up as 420, does that include all of the necessary components of that sound bite in a 1/44100th of a second? How would a sample at value 421 compare? Is this like a RGB type situation where you’d have multiple values corresponding to different attributes of the sample (amplitude, frequencies, and I’m sure other things)? Is a single sample actually intelligible in isolation?
In the same way that watching porn on public transit is a social no-no
Manufacturing
So I missed it the first time. But the title is “A The Lord of the Rings Game”. Assumedly to maintain copyright, they did not drop the “The” from “The Lord of the Rings” even though they started with “A”
Interesting how insurance companies demand restrictions to “special enrollment” periods or specified times to begin coverage. It’s a tactic to prevent people from beginning coverage before taking on significant healthcare costs and then cancelling after their treatment is finished.
But yet, an insurance company is able to change coverage without following similar practices? Is just about as close to a bait and switch as you can get.
I think we’re going to need a bit of an explanation here
what