no its fine, they changed it with amendments. surely over the years they’ve had a bunch of changes

only 27 amendments

the 18th and 21st amendments just cancel each other out

the most recent amendment was 34 years ago, and was proposed in 1789

yep, amendments are keeping up with the times

the heck is that body-sized blue fish-hook thing

I’ll go out on a limb and say that the country that needs information smuggled in, is likely closer to hell on earth than not.

I don’t love that the headline as well as the first line of the article use the words “says” and “claims”.

the jury ruled he was guilty. we’re so far past “allegedly” and all that garbage. he did it. she was drugged. she was raped. there is no reason to be inferring any amount of doubt anymore.

I like the idea of documenting what I’m doing all that, but I have a hard time rationalizing what should actually be recorded.

like if I’m debugging something, and I’m putting silly print statements to quickly troubleshoot, should I document that?

there are certainly times where it makes sense to have a record, but there seems to be many more instances of not needing it at all, which then makes you see recording it as a silly formality, which then kills any motivation to continue recording.

the bit that I always am happy to know is that through his entire show, he never appeared to be outwardly religious.

he said be kind, because it’s good to do, not because god said.

he said love one another, because it’s wonderful to be loved back, not because it was in some book.

that he was able to preach without the stigma of religion gave the enormous reach across cultures that his program had.

seems like you sorta went off the headline and not the content as the entire article talks about emotional health and regulation.

obviously lead is not an advantageous difference, but it’s also disingenuous to imply it’s the difference in generations.

calling it a body shelf really hits different tho

You’re talking about the account that has AI in its name?

How would you go about using a different subdomain without something like a reverse proxy? Heck, in my head that’s almost the only reason I use a reverse proxy

By the looks of it, it’s 30% to NYC, 30% to Texas, and 30% to California. So 10% for literally everywhere else in the US. That’s gotta be close, right?

what

Hm. I’d be interested in seeing anything backing that up. You’ve just broadly stated that “ineffective” tax policies don’t work well, and I feel that is sorta in the name. Is there any line of reasoning that would make “wealth taxes” ineffective?

Truthfully, it’s far from relevant that the kid is autistic.

If you drag a child by the ankle, especially as a teacher, you’re a 100% piece of shit.

I’m not sure who you mean is shilling for corporations, but that’s certainly not the vibe I got from most of this thread.

It would be nice to see corporate profits wiped, especially after so much price gouging we’ve had to endure.

But why do you think that gouging will stop?

Let’s imagine that it does hurt corporate profits first. Will they survive? Probably the big ones, might be a bit harder for little ones. So the world keeps turning, right? But like you said the end customer will eat some of the costs, so we agree that prices will go up in the end.

Where’s the upside? More money funneled into the government? Paid by the increased prices for the consumer, or some dips in corporate profits?

I’m not sure that’s a win for the consumer normies.

How far back in the day are you thinking? I’m pretty sure recreational drugs have been around for a long while.

I’m unfamiliar with the mineral rights treaty specifics, but I remember it being said that it was a pretty shite deal for Ukraine anyway, and that it likely wouldn’t have been signed anyway

I only went back to read the comment because you told me you upvoted it. I wanted to make sure it was worthy.

!it was!<

You just casually dropping in that 832 is divisible by 8 makes me feel as if there’s a small gap in our abilities to do mental math