oh so you’re just an unhappy person

oh no!! good thing that doesn’t impact anything

you should try reading zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance

I didn’t say you couldn’t? my point was that the people you were complaining about were merely saying they don’t like wired buds. that’s it. stop trying to infer a deeper meaning

no, that the inconvenience of wired earbuds outweighs any advantages. which would still apply to a different port

maybe you’re completely missing their point

maybe with that attitude

try a factor of 100

unfortunately in reality it is a curved line on a sphere

metal detectors? pretty easy since it’s a ticketed event

a very fine line to tread indeed

how is a concern about upending precedent a nonsensical statement? the source of an argument does not impact its validity as a point

but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument

but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument

not saying you’re wrong, but that is a whataboutism

I meant that both only exist due to the labor of individuals. without the workforce, billionaires and corporations would not exist

arguably billionaires and corporations are still people-powered

edit: as in the wealth of billionaires and corporations only exists due to the exploration of the labor of the people. without that labor, billionaires wouldn’t exist

they’re still people

why can’t you start the music from the notification pane?

a source is always needed tf