We used to have earbuds that don’t need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn’t get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      139
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      And the cord would sometimes break inside/connector went bad.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        82
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, you’d snag the wire or slightly bend the connector and then you were just playing a game of making sure it stayed plugged into the exact right angle.

        • silasmariner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Had to make sure there has just the right tension on the left wire or you’d only get half the track. Bonus points for weirdly mixed stereo where that just sounded shit

        • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Or replace it, those things were like 50 cents and all sorts of devices had earbuds delivered with them, included in the price.

      • goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        and then you’d just replace them with one of the other three dozen you bought from Wal-Mart for five bucks back in 2016

          • goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            hey I’ll have you know I keep all my broken earbuds in the same box in the garage with all the other cables and assorted dongles I can no longer identify and will likely never use, like any responsible citizen should

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            If you think Bluetooth earphones won’t also be in that pile once the batteries stop holding charge after 2 years, you’re in for a world of dissapointing sex

            • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              My AirBudz are over five years old and still play for like five hours before I need to charge them… and I used them 40+ hours daily for all of those years.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              My point wasn’t wired vs wireless. It was disposable crap that breaks vs corporations not deliberately making crap the only thing most people can comfortably afford.

              • tetris11@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                3 months ago

                But they need to skimp on those few milligram ounces of solder per bud, so that they can make one extra low quality bud!

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Or rather so they can make the same number of buds and double or more the profits for the amoral shareholder dividends.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t think earbuds make up a significant percentage of the patch to be here virtue signaling and shaming people for what they were encouraged to do by corporate greed. Your source says the great majority of the patch comes from agriculture and fishing.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t think earbuds make up a significant percentage of the patch

              Cheap and disposable plastics and electronics IS a significant part of the world garbage problem and yes, plastic particles is MOST of the garbage patch specifically.

              be here virtue signaling and shaming people for what they were encouraged to do by corporate greed

              Whoa, dude, hold your horses! I’m in no way blaming consumers. Making consumer electronics cheap crap that breaks easily and everything of decent quality prohibitively expensive is 100% on the greedy corporations, not their victims the consumers.

              Your source says the great majority of the patch comes from agriculture and fishing.

              Ok, admittedly a poor choice of example. Doesn’t invalidate my intended point though, however ill-stated heh

              • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                This is tough -

                Making consumer electronics cheap crap that breaks easily and everything of decent quality prohibitively expensive is 100% on the greedy corporations, not their victims the consumers.

                (US here) Gets me thinking about dollar store headphones. Consumers could buy decent headphones for about $10 direct from overseas. When that’s equivalent to more than an hour of wages, there’s still demand for the $1 version. Should this need not be met out of a sense of social responsibility?

                (I don’t have a perfect answer myself)

                Econ 101 on my mind here btw:

                • Serinus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The problem is that our economic system has encouraged an environment where reputation is a thing to be immediately cashed out. You can’t even know if those $10 earbuds are any better than the $1 version.

              • Tankton@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                When people talk about disposable plastic they don’t mean electronics like earbuds. They mean packaging, plastic bottles, plastic bags etc.

          • marduk@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m here for the wired headphone -> pacific garbage patch vs lithium battery child labor -> wireless headphone fight 🍿

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’d imagine the limited lifespan of their batteries and the fact that they have ones to begin with would be of bigger concern

                • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  That’s fair. My first pair still works awesome after five years, and I’ve used them for 40+ hours a week for that whole time. I only have a new pair because I needed ANC, but I still use my old pair to sleep.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                You might want to edit the comment since in the context it definitely sounds like saying wireless would be better

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Not really, no. I’m responding to a comment about cheap buds that break too easily, which isn’t exclusive to wired ones.

                  There’s literally no mention of the wired vs wireless aspect in my comment or the one I’m replying to.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        The TWS equivalent to that is one of the buds no longer turning on. I just had to RMA a pair because of that.

    • Nick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah! That’s why I loved Sennheiser IEMs, they had oval cables that never tangle up, no matter what you do. Still have a pair for my Switch

      • Blubber28@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Loved those as well and I am very angry they are no longer sold (at least not here). Even Sennheiser doesn’t escape the enshittification for their mid-range earbuds

    • Noodle07@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Remember when they got stuck somewhere and yanked out of your ears? Somehow my Bluetooth headset don’t get that because it has Bluetooth

      • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hate it when the Bluetooth gets caught on the door handle and rips my blue tooth out

      • Bob@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You know you don’t have to dangle cables about willy-nilly at full length? You can partially wind them up or tie a loose knot so they’re effectively shorter, or hold them in place under clothes or a peg or anything. I thought this was self-explanatory?

        • Noodle07@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I know, but I still don’t miss it. Tbf I also switched from earbuds to headset at the same time

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I do this simple trick (Warning: YouTube video), and my cables don’t tangle at all, unless of course I forget to do that. It might cause cable to break more easily, but idk., my earphones tend to break just before warranty ends, which is fine for me.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      As a runner I hated cables. All the time I’d be in the middle of a run and my hand would catch the cord mid stride and yank them out of my ear.

  • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    All these people saying they like wireless earphones are completely missing the point. Devices with headphones jacks can do both. Taking away the headphone jack means you have to rely on wireless earphones, which have all the issues the post describes.

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      But Apple was so BRAVE when they removed the jack!

      I wholeheartedly agree, I use Bluetooth most of the time, but I want wired to fall back on. When I’m on the go, bluetooth works just fine, but when I’m sitting down at home I prefer to use my full-size Roland headset on both my PC and my phone. No latency, and superior sound quality.

      • doctortran@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Bless the few companies out there still putting them (and the SD card slot) into Androids, but even they’re getting more and more scarce. I need to upgrade soon and I’ve never felt my opinions were so limited, let alone combining with other things like network compatibility, unlockable bootloader, etc.

        Android used to be the anti-Apple. You used to have so many options, and so much freedom.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because of….? Anyway I have headphones that have a lightning jack and don’t need an adapter.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          IDK. I use one and have no problem with it. My car’s bluetooth is rather unreliable at connecting, so I just us a USB C->aux cable. I’ve got no complaints. Is it as good a signal as a properly paired bluetooth digital audio connection? No. But it’s certainly as good as the old aux->aux cables I used back in the day.

      • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Adapters are a cop out. Just put the adapters in the phone. It also means you can’t charge and listen to music.

        Also while there are some natively wired usb-c headphones, I can’t think of any. Any decent headphones will use a standard 3.5 or 6.5mm audio jack, and then the dac being built inwith those usb-c headphones means you can’t use a seperate dac, it means you can’t plug them into studio gear. It’s just so incredibly limiting.

        There is already a universal standard (3.5mm/6.5mm jack) it carries analog audio, why change to a digital connection which requires digital to analog conversion? Why not let the user be able to have a dedicated piece of gear to do that if they wish.

        No professional equipment, or even semi professional equipment uses usb-c. It’s a good old fashioned analog audio jack and it’s like that for a reason

      • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I use an adapter from Walmart and it works better than a regular aux plug in a car? Do you think that the audio signal is boosted over type c?

      • i_give_u_worms@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        i really don’t want to have to carry one more piece of junk, and while USB C is way better than alternatives, bending the dongle in your pocket while it is attached to the phone is a scary thought, wired earbuds make a hard right turn right out of the socket. The socket does fill with lint, I kind of get it that removing reduces loss of the phone from water damage or related assembly costs to making the socket not-a-water-vector

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It also means you gotta rely on the sound quality of the smartphone. I carried an Oppo HA-2SE strapped to my phone just because I wanted better. Wireless earbuds are just like carrying a Fiio BTR-5 and some good IEMs but without all the fuss. Totally has it’s own brand of fuss though.

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Correct. That’s why I will NEVER buy brand new wireless earbuds from Apple, Samsung, or any other phone manufacturer. Oh, you took the aux port out of your phones? Go fuck yourself. I will not financially reward you for limiting my freedoms.

      Currently I use Jabra Active 8s. The Jabra Active 10s are supposed to be so much better, but for the price, the 8s are just pretty good.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        What point? That the removal of a feature like the headphone jack is a good thing?

        • yetiftw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          3 months ago

          no, that the inconvenience of wired earbuds outweighs any advantages. which would still apply to a different port

          • nialv7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            wdym? you can still use wireless with a phone that has a headphone jack.

            • yetiftw@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              3 months ago

              I didn’t say you couldn’t? my point was that the people you were complaining about were merely saying they don’t like wired buds. that’s it. stop trying to infer a deeper meaning

  • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It also destroyed the “pass the aux cord” when driving with friends.

    “Hey, I want to show you a song. Pass the aux cord.”

    Plugs

    Plays

    Now:

    “Hey, I want to show you a song. Let me connect to your car’s Bluetooth.”

    “Oh, I can’t while the car is driving. Can you pull over for a minute?”

    “Which submenu was is it in? Bluetooth or Settings?”

    “Do you mind if I remove one of the devices already connected?”

    “Oh, it just auto-connected to your phone instead.”

    “Here, I’ll just send you a link.”

    “Your phone locked. Can you enter your password again?”

    “Oh, you don’t have [streaming service] premium? We’ll have to sit through an ad first.”

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can still do that if you want. My car’s bluetooth is finicky, so I just have a USB C->aux cable adapter I use. You can share between people and have them share their music. It doesn’t help with the password issues, but you absolutely can still use an aux cable with modern phones. You just need to use a USB C->aux rather than an aux->aux.

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        So glad the Europeans finally broke Apple and their ridiculous charger shenanigans. A coworker just got a new iPhone and asked me if I had an iPhone charger, I told them no all Ive got is USB C. They said they didn’t know what they had and showed me the bottom of their phone and, sure enough, it’s USB C. They had no idea that only Apple kept making their own charge connector and that basically everyone else had settled on one charger/data port like two or three standards ago.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        You just need to use a USB C->aux rather than an aux->aux.

        And make sure it’s not a cheap adapter so you get a reasonable volume out of it.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I love my car but it DOESN’T HAVE AN AUX JACK. Insanity. This fancy ass infotainment system with insanely delayed Bluetooth and I can’t use my amazing Bluetooth-to-3.5mm adapter that connects INSTANTLY and doesn’t lag two second behind when I hit pause and ughhhh

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well, then that is truly bullshit. I wouldn’t even buy a car without one. Have you checked your manual? Maybe there’s a hidden wire somewhere that you can attach an extension cable to.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I have indeed read the manual :c it’s wild too, cuz it’s a super high end stock system with a million speakers and a subwoofer hahaha. Checked forums and yep… USB and Bluetooth ONLY :c

            I could swap it out but it’s whatever, it’s not worth the effort and money. It sounds excellent, I just wish the BT was fast like my cheap BT-Aux adapter…

              • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Nawhhh I prefer Bluetooth… I like to be able to just get in and go but listen through my phone. I do have a flash drive in the USB, though!

            • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Maybe try a Bluetooth fm transmitter? I have one because my car is too old for bluetooth and also doesnt have aux, but its great and snappy and i just have to reach down to the cigarette lighter to switch songs.

              • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Great suggestion! My sound system is nuts tho, and I’m otherwise an audiophile so that doesn’t work out for me. But thank you <3!

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      You don’t just pass a phone around? Any long trip, start a queue, add a song, pass clockwise. And if you fuck up the queue and hit play by accident you have to do a shot wherever we end up.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re probably joking, but yeah, I don’t really hang out with people I don’t trust at this point in my life, I’m 37.

    • hex@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      My civic has a Pioneer audio ui and I have an aux cord!! It’s a usb-c to aux but yeah. It works nicely. Too bad it’s USB-c and everyone’s phones still take lightning.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can do this with wired carplay/android auto if you really want. Basically every car made after 2018 has the two, even the cheapest of the cheap.

      Bluetooth audio (only) only ever had a pretty short reign. And basically every car that came with bluetooth also had a USB port for ipods which still works with modern iPhones (and some android devices).

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why on earth would you not just hand them the phone to put a song in queue. Also what songs are exclusive to a specific streaming service? Just play it on whatever you were already listening on.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve thrown away so many headphones because the cable frayed though. There’s always some downsides.

    • reev@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      What do y’all do to your headphones that this is a major issue? I’ve never really had wireless headphones and I think I’ve maybe had one pair of wired ones that had that issue in my life.

          • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Pocket? Idk, it seems natural to me that moving around with a device in your pocket, plugged into a pair of headphones would cause bending and twisting of the cord, which would wear it out over time.

            And lots of other stresses, like accidentally getting them caught on something and yanking them out of your ears, wrapping them up to put away in a bag/pocket, etc. It’s no wonder I wore out so many pairs.

            OTOH, the only wired listening device I own now is a headset that I wear at my desk, which I expect to last forever because it’s subject to none of those stresses.

            • reev@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

              Guess I’ve just been lucky. I assume some people might also pull out the cable at the cord instead of at the base, I’ve seen that happening with charging cables sometimes.

              At the moment I also have to use a little C to 3.5mm adapter and could maybe see that taking some damage but so far so good.

              • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I could see the (USB-?)C adapter taking the worst of the wear-and-tear, and maybe being more resilient than plugging the 3.5mm directly into the device. Imagine the travesty if it turned out that USB-C adapters turned out to be the solution to fragile headphones all along!

        • reev@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Okay that’s a fair point my lazy ass had not considered. Although cycling hasn’t caused me any issues.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      And they would inevitably get tangled up in your pocket every time and you had to deal with the cord somehow when you connected, usually under your shirt or something. I went through a new corded headphone every 3 months or so. Meanwhile, the free pair of airpods I got from work are still going after ~5 years.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m going into my third pair of ear buds because the batteries only survive for 1h after 2-3 years if you are a heavy user, my wired JBL is still going strong.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I remember they used to last me for years around 2005-2010. Now it is like every year at latest i need to get new ones because the cable got fucked.

      • bizarroland@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I bought a pair of wired earbuds off of wish or temu, something like that, they were like eight or nine dollars.

        Honestly compared to any Bluetooth headphones I’ve used, equivalent or better sound quality. And the wire can be pulled out and replaced for just a buck if need be. I’ve had them for 2 years now and they have been wonderful.

        Also Moto phones with their operational 3.5 mm jacks for the win.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    3 months ago

    They also didn’t add an extra layer of compression between the player and your ears - because they had a fucking headphone jack and wires that could transmit audio data without compression.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    On the other hand, bluetooth headphones never catch on a doorknob and yank out of your ears

    • OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      On the other other hand, we already had the option of choosing Bluetooth headphones back when most phones still offered headphones jacks.

      Truth is, there are obviously pros and cons of each, but it just sucks that we no longer have the choice without jumping through extra hoops.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      And the noise cancelling/amplification is something wired headphones probably would never do, and they aren’t more expensive than ear buds, unless you got the cheapest ear buds (that probably sounded like shit and had cords that would fray within months of use), oh and if you used them at all “actively” the cords would eventually wear out even in expensive models. I’ve got a 20$pair of ear buds from 3 years ago(wanted to make sure I wouldn’t lose them before investing in expensive ones, now I don’t actually like my expensive ones except for airplanes, and still use my cheapos). Oh and you couldn’t be more than 3 feet from your phone if it was charging, and you couldn’t fast forward, rewind, play/pause (if you had a great pair it had a volume control, that didn’t actually change the volume, just added resistance to the signal).

      Ask my wife, I was one of the biggest sticks in the mud about losing my headphone jack and changing over to Bluetooth, but since I made the change, I’ve found plenty of reasons to be happy with it. I still miss my old phones built in infrared blaster though. And easily replaceable battery. There were some neat things you could do with the aux jack (credit card reader), and there was some convenience to having things corded together (especially if you’re absent minded) but it’s not as rosey as many would insist it was.

      The rose tinted glasses people use when looking back (car technology, streaming being worse than cable, the Internet sucking (though much better arguments for this one)) is really a burr in my side.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Meh. I don’t miss getting the cord caught on door handles and having the earbuds violently yanked from my ears!

  • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I didn’t believe the hype about wireless headphones until I bought some with noise cancelling and all that for around $130.

    Pros:

    1 - You don’t realize how “tethered” you feel on older headphones until you really try to use wireless headphones. There’s a certain freedom you feel when you realize you can place your phone on a hotel table but lie down in bed.

    2 - Noise cancelling and noise passthrough is a transformative experience when travelling or find yourself abroad. Airports are much easier to feel relaxed in when 80% of the noise or so can be filtered out as you wait for your flight to board. Additionally, the flight experience is less annoying (no engine drone gets through, even passengers can mostly be ignored) but you still have the option for pass through if someone absolutely needs to talk to you.

    3 - Many of these headphones come with some kind of EQ feature, which can occasionally mean that you get speakers with more tunability and thus slightly better bang-for-buck that works globally across apps.

    4 - Audio quality. Since these are expensive drivers, you’re often going to get better sound quality than those cheap 30 dollar throw aways were ever going to give.

    Cons:

    1 - Latency. These things could never be used in professional audio situations other than listening to a pre-rendered song for quality judgements. I don’t thing gaming would be nice with these either, even if I’ve tried (and failed) to play counter strike on these on occasion to keep noise levels down.

    2 - Mic quality of the built in is lacking on my particular headphones (Sennheiser CX Plus). They’re really only intended to capture the outdoor for noise cancellation IMO, not the greatest for calls or recordings. They’re servicable, but it’s the area I’d like the most upgrade (and it would probably improve noise cancellation features as well.)

    3 - Environmental / Sustainability Concerns: Other than people just “losing” these devices with built in batteries that are bad for the environment being a problem in and of itself, there are other long-standing concerns I have about these devices. They often require proprietary non-open software to configure, meaning if the software gets delisted, you will no longer be able to configure them until someone comes up with some kind of alternative using reverse engineering (good luck). Batteries are likely to degrade over time, meaning you’ll eventually end up with a worthless ear bud on the left or right and the only solution will be to throw them out. These things are often pretty bad scoring on repairability metrics, and I can’t even blame the companies producing them here because they’re so small.

    4 - Despite passthrough being a feature, it’s hard to convey to people that you can actually hear them through the device. There should be some kind of blinking light on the outside that indicates that passthrough is enabled or something.

    So I actually do love these devices, but #3 of the cons is really the biggest real issue I have with them. If they’re going to cost over 100 dollars, I would like to know that these things won’t just become ewaste in the same way that cheap crappy wired headphones end up being as well (which sea life often chokes on or gets tangled up in.) If they costs a premium, I would really like to know that they aren’t a figurative dead end when they eventually fail.

  • Logical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Tbh I like the convenience of not being physically attached to my phone when listening to music. That said, the removal of headphone jacks from phones is a disgrace.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    All this romanticizing the past, but who members having to play with the jack until it was just the right in and out to get full stereo. I member. Who members breaking a wire for the left speaker only, so you only have right audio. I member

    • AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The real problem is that new phones dont have it, while there are actually people who use it.

      To be honest i dont use it either, but i still prefer having it. Just in case you know? Phones without it did not get cheaper after all…

      • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are still phones that have it. Sometimes even pretty good ones. It’s just that they are not advertised so heavily. I recently learned about HTC U23 or 24 or something. Now I feel dumb because I never bothered to check because I always thought all good phones don’t offer headphone jacks anymore.

      • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think you meant new iPhones* don’t have it. There are new models coming out every year with a headphone jack.

        You can still get a Sony Xperia 1 VI, or a 5 VI, or a bunch of mid range devices with headphone jack. There are offerings with headphone jack, so if you want one, you can get one.

        Now the problem is we love to complain but not put our money where our mouth is. Has the lack of headphone jack made the iPhone sales suffer? No, they’ve gone up. Does Samsung sell fewer Galaxy’s? Nope. Is the Xperia range a massive success because they have a headphone jack? Not by any stretch of imagination…

        …because most people don’t actually care enough to vote with their wallet instead of yapping away while they buy a jack-less phone anyway.

        • moriquende@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s because getting a headphone jack is lower in the list of priorities than, say, having a great camera. If I could get my current phone in a version having a headphone jack, believe me that I would. I just wasn’t prepared to compromise my camera quality for it.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re the second person to say this but I’ve been using the headphone jack for like 3 decades and haven’t encountered this issue.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Having lived through that period but absolutely never experiencing this I wonder… Could the (port on the) devices just have been shitty?

      I remember crackling when turning the plug and mono when not being inserted properly, though

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I remember getting horrible feedback in my car’s stereo when I tried to simultaneously charge my mp3 player from the car’s cigarette lighter adapter and run an aux cable. Somehow this resulted in a feedback loop that ruined the audio quality. I had to either charge or listen to music, not both.

    • Swarfega@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are you purposely saying “remembers” wrong or do you think the actual word is “members”?

  • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    A friend was complaining that he was always losing his air pods. I told him about my awesome idea to sell a little cord that would connect them so they were easier to keep track of.

    He was like, ‘Dude! That’s a great idea… You’ve got to start selling those before someone beats you to it-’

    Then it dawned on him and he called me an asshat.

  • b0gl@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Last time I used wired headphones on my old phone, I was riding a bike. One of the buds slipped out of my ear and got caught in the front wheel, dragging my phone out of my pocket and smashing the screen. 10/10

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wish I could watch a video of that.

      Also, headphone cords go under clothing when doing activities like that.

    • Bob@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      https://www.isadoraduncan.org/about-1

      Isadora Duncan’s death was as dramatic as her life. On September 14, 1927, she encountered a young driver in Nice, France and suggested he take her for a spin in his open-air Bugatti sports car. As the car took off, she reportedly shouted to her friends, “Adieu, mes amis, je vais a la gloire!” — “Goodbye my friends, I go to glory!” Moments later, her trailing shawl became entangled in the rear wheel, breaking her neck instantly.

  • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    This issue is solely the fault of capitalism. By removing choice you are forced to by a more premium product, but you’re advertised it by all the supposed benefits: one less external opening on the phone, no more tangled headphones, no more dealing with headphones that only work when the cord is plugged in just right, no more chance of your headphone port going bad.

    They skip over the fact that most of these issues are directly problematic because of cost cutting and designed obsolescence (aka engineered lifetimes). The opening is one thing, but headphones tangle in pockets easily because they use such thin flimsy cords. Same thing goes for cords breaking in the lining and only working at certain angles: a more robust cord would be less prone to issues.

    On top of this, the entire designs of phones not having repairability in mind is the only reason that a headphone port breaking is a big deal. If they were designed to be disassembled with replacement parts being readily available, it wouldn’t be an issue. They could even make the ports more robust to decrease failure rate.

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    These jacks are still in every other audio device. They were removed from phones to force BT usage, which Google needs for their profiling telemetry network and Apple for their Find my Device thing. God forbid someone turns BT off or even decides they would prefer a phone without BT entirely. There is no other reason and how people prefer to listen to music has nothing to do with the subject.

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Doubt there is any conspiracy. Headphone jack was probably removed to cut cost since wireless earbuds were becoming popular and majority of users did not mind. It annoyed me at first as well, but once I went with BT earbuds and headset, I cannot imagine going back to wired except when stationary on PC. Battery life is 30 or so hours and I do not thing I have ever had problems with connection.

      Only thing that worries me is that your earbuds probably are an e-waste once battery no longer can hold a charge. That said my current earbuds are basically destroyed even though their battery still is fine.

      • Omodi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        There were cut because they make a lot of money selling wireless earbuds.

      • gencha@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s no conspiracy. It’s just a valid strategy to expand your business. It’s not unheard of that companies form cartels. Car companies manipulate millions of vehicles to trick lab tests. Companies like Apple and Google don’t have your best interest at heart. Don’t ever assume their decisions are driven by popular demand. They actively lobby to steer demand.

        Removing a few cents worth of metal to cut costs? Because not enough users need it? That sounds more convincing than one of these companies trying to expand their proprietary BT global network features? Not to me at this time.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Waterproofing is very difficult with a headphone jack. You’ll notice virtually every single phone with a headphone jack is ‘splash resistant’ while many without are able to survive being submerged. It also saves a relatively large amount of internal space, for something that easy to move external with an adapter.

      If we’re talking about adding back in older communication standards, I would personally prefer an am/fm receiver and IR blaster; it would be cool to use my phone like a universal remote.

      • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Waterproofing is very difficult with a headphone jack

        Something I have heard in the past but is a headphone jack that much harder to waterproof vs a USB-C port? I’m genuinely curious because I don’t know. It feels like the two would be of a similar difficulty.

        • terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, also Samsung made it work in the S active phones, and Nokia has started carrying the torch with their XR line. That’s Def not the reason for them being removed.

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think most USB-C ports have sensors that allow them to turn off when wet. I’m not sure what the challenges are doing something like that with the headphone jack.

          • drathvedro@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            They don’t even need to do that. Just blast music straight into the water. It’s not like anyone would be listening anyway.

      • Lojcs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Samsung had headphone jack until note 10 and ip67/68 rating since s5. Similar story with other brands. What you described are two separate trends.

        am/fm

        Cheap phones still have fm radio support. Pretty sure it’s disabled in software in everything else, and you need cabled headphones to serve as an antenna either way (not sure if usb c works).

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          That makes me wonder how the Zune pulled of having a pretty solid and clear radio without an antenna. Must have had one wrapped around the inner casing or something.

      • gencha@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t get what people are doing who need waterproof phones, but I will accept that some people need this. To me it sounds far more like an edge case than people wanting wired headphones though, especially at the time they started removing jacks.

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I really can’t say for sure. It rains a lot where I live, so water proofing is a pretty big boon for me. I used to carry around a USB-C to headphone port adapter, but I never used it.

          • gencha@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Valid. I’ve been thinking though. What’s the problem with making a waterproof audio jack, if we have the USB C for charging?

            I don’t want to hate on wireless by any means. I often prefer wireless. But it’s really fucking nice to have a power source connected and audio as well. It’s very convenient. Especially if you have a dock and headset.

            It just feels like such a redundant transformation that achieved nothing for the user.

            • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              There’s adapters that allow charging at the same time. I’m not sure why audio jacks are difficult to waterproof. Samsung managed it on a few models, so it’s certainly possible.

              Personally I haven’t had a situation where I wanted an audio jack in years, I assume the extra internal space goes towards things like longer battery life or slimmer form factors; not nothing, but also probably not a big deal for most people.

              It seems like laptops are doing the same thing: all external ports are USB, and any specific needs get handled with dongles.

              USB-C ports are pretty flexible, you can split one into many, use them for video & audio, use them for power delivery & networking, and they can transfer more data per second than cat5. It seems like manufacturers are trying to make it the one port to rule them all.

    • Lojcs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      profiling telemetry network

      Of course they need it for the very real scary words functionality

      • gencha@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Every single signal your Android phone sends, like looking up the address of a website with Google DNS, or just synchronizing your time with Google time servers, which are defaults in most Android phones, goes right into at least a shadow profile.

        Android exists to create highly detailed profiles of individuals, using your own device usage, and detecting other devices around you. Like WiFi hotspots to offer more detailed position information.

        Every single time any of this happens, you leave a data point in a Google database. Collecting all BT devices every time you see them as data points is so dramatically valuable if this is your core business. Google is an advertisement platform.

        • Lojcs@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You know bluetooth doesn’t need to be turned on in the settings for your phone to scan for devices right? Google doesn’t need to trick you with earphones to turn it on. Why do these conspiracy theories always involve the vampire politely asking to come into your home anyways?

          • gencha@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I know they can still use the chip even if you don’t want BT. I know they can still use it regardless of your desire to disable it. If there was no reasonable user demand for it, then it would be pretty hard to sell a useless piece of metal that only eats up energy and space in the phone.

            You know, like an audio jack.

            No other type of audio device saw the need to have the jack removed. The BT-only headphones were introduced by the same companies who removed the audio jack from the phones.

            Nobody is “tricking” anyone. This is just as regular a shady business practice as false advertising. The companies doing this just weigh their options to maximize profits. This is a laughably easy sell, apparently, so it’s reasonable they would be doing it. The complaints about this subject were loud from day one. Removing the jack is artificially limiting the features of the device for literally no plausible reason. Point to their material that explains it in more words than “we decided it’s time”.

            We had the entire oil and tobacco industry lie to us for decades, but this is far fetched?

            • Lojcs@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s really hard to follow your train of thought. Bluetooth isn’t a piece of metal in your phone. It uses the same antenna your phone needs for its other wireless connections and it’s also driven by the same modem. Compared to an audio jack its impact is miniscule. The demand for Bluetooth wasn’t created in 2016, it predates smartphones. There were countless wireless earphones before 2016 and they mostly weren’t even made by phone companies. Apple removing the headphone jack wasn’t ‘false advertising’, it was very well publicised.

              Yes, phone companies removed the headphone jack from their phones to drive the sales of their own earphones. Yes, Google collects lots of data about you. But interpolating these to “Google wanted people to keep Bluetooth on for its spy network” is a far fetched conspiracy