• IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    So at what point of doing something does it actually become the thing that it was?

    Seems pretty obvious to me.

    • markko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      From a legal point of view it hasn’t been tried in a court of law, which is why words like “apparently” and “allegedly” are used.

      • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        So if Elon literally lay down on the ground we couldn’t say he lay on the ground? You’re saying we would have to say allegedly? What he did is not in question, their argument was intent. It should be obvious that he lay on the ground but reported as possibly unintentionally lay on the ground. The action is clear as day and should not be up for dispute

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes. It’s impossible to report objectively on capitalists with enough control to sue. This has been shown again and again.

        • markko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That is literally what happens in US news when the subject involves a criminal offence or could be considered defamation.