• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    Unfortunately, there are only 3 companies developing browsers right now: Google, Apple and Mozilla.

    Apple’s browsers are only available on Apple platforms. In fact, if you’re on iOS you have no choice, you have to use Safari. Even browsers labelled as “Chrome” or “Firefox” are actually Safari under the hood on iOS. But, on any non Apple platform, you can’t use Safari.

    Google is an ad company, so they don’t want to allow ad blockers on their browser. So, it’s a matter of time before every kind of ad blocking is disabled for Chrome users.

    Firefox is almost entirely funded by Google, so there’s a limit as to what they can do without the funding getting cut off. They seem to be trying to find a way forward without Google, but the result, if anything is as bad as Google if not worse:

    “investing in privacy-respecting advertising to grow new revenue in the near term; developing trustworthy, open source AI to ensure technical and product relevance in the mid term;”

    https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-leadership-growth-planning-updates/

    All these other browser people like are basically reskinned versions of Chrome or Firefox. They have a handful of people working on them. To actually develop a modern browser you need a big team. A modern browser basically has to be an OS capable of running everything from a 3d game engine, to a word processor, to a full featured debugger.

    It looks like it’s only a matter of time before there will be 0 browsers capable of blocking ads, because the only two companies that make multi-platform browsers depend on ads for their revenue, and both of them will have enormous expenses because they’re obsessed with stupid projects like AI.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    Vivaldi on Linux and Windows is still good in my experience, and so far uBlock Origin for manifest v2 still works. I hope they keep v2 support forever, forking completely if they must.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Chrome? A browser that’s easily replaceable with any other browser? Huh… Didn’t see that one coming.

    /S

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I’m saying this as a 2 year convert Firefox user: mostly easily replaceable. Sure, I can browse pretty much every page that I can on chrome. However, a few sites don’t work the same way - sometimes because of the site’s conscious decision, sometimes because of Firefox.

      Take Facebook, for example. On desktop, I can’t make voice calls anymore from the desktop site. For a while it was possible with non encrypted chats, but now pretty much all of them are encrypted, and FF is not compatible with that. I also can’t watch h265 videos in my chats anymore. I’m still sticking with FF, but I just can’t easily say that FF is just as good for everything (I’m still not going back to chrome).

      • ButtDrugs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah I’m a 20-some year FF user and when it started you had to have IE as a backup because not everything was compatible. In the late 2000s through late 2010s everything worked everywhere, then with chromes dominance places have stopped testing or supporting certain things in FF and it feels like history is repeating itself. Unfortunately you need a chromium-based backup realistically for certain sites, but 99.5% of things work totally fine in FF.

        • Brumefey@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          A lot of websites are broken on Firefox which is a shame. I can’t even scroll down on some news sites. What a shame…

          • therichkid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            This might be the fault of your ublock filters rather than Firefox. Do you have a cookie banner filter list? Some websites are blocking scrolling until you make a cookie decision. A short disable of ublock, rejecting the cookies should then work. The “downside” of a powerful ad blocker

            • hkspowers@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Agreed, I’ve never come across a site that was broken because of Firefox. Usually the culprit is adblock being too good at blocking, so just toggle it off and refresh and page loads just fine.

    • nahostdeutschland@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      180
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Let’s be honest: Everything that might be “worse” or “annoying” in Firefox for someone is not relevant in comparison to “no working adblocker available”. A browser without adblock is unusable

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        I haven’t actually found anything that doesn’t work on Firefox on my personal computer. At work we also use Firefox, and some things don’t work on it, but some things don’t work on chrome or edge either, it’s a hodge poge.

      • P1nkman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        True, but if an adblocker no longer works on a specific browser, change your browser! I started using Netscape back in '94, and lost count on how many browsers I’ve tested and used in the past… Holy shit, 30+ years!!

        • imvii@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 minutes ago

          Mosaic was awesome. Netscape 1 was pretty cool, but Netscape 2 and animated gifs… zowie! That was a day to remember.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          15 hours ago

          30+ years!

          …fuck off, '94 wasn’t 30… counts on fingers several times

          …Shit…

          • Teal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It doesn’t sound right but it is. I think in ‘94 I was using Juno for email and internet. Shortly after that it was time to actually use one of the many AOL trial discs for service instead of a mini frisbee/ninja star.

            Modem sounds, chat rooms, you’ve got mail. What a time to live!

            • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Fuck. I got free internet for almost 5 years. So many AOL discs. 01, 02? Friend’s dad had a T1 connection put into their house for his work. The difference between T1 and the 56k I had at home? At home walk out the room, have a smoke, maybe ⅔ a boob loaded. At buddy’s house, that’s when I realised that the internet had the potential to change everything. Whole boob before you could even stand up.

              Kids these days. No appreciation for how much struggle it used to be. Everything just. Just there. No bork the only computer in the house because boob.exe.

          • P1nkman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I know… Jurassic Park is 33 years this year. It would be like watching a movie from the 60’ when it was released.

            We’re old, friend.

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          22 hours ago

          In the past 10 years it’s pretty much just been Firefox, Safari, Explorer/Edge, and Chrome. 99% of browsers are just skinned Chrome. Even Edge now. Opera’s engine died in 2013.

          • P1nkman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            22 hours ago

            99% if browsers are just skinned Chrome.

            Yup. Hence, the reason I originally suggested to use Firefox, only because it’s not built on Chromium.

            • AJ1@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Hence, the reason I originally suggested to use Firefox

              Just FYI, the word “hence” literally means “for this reason”. So you just said “for this reason the reason” lol.

              • zewm@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Chill dude, I’m just going to the ATM machine to put in my PIN number to take out some money. 🤙

            • Bourff@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Chrome forked Webkit in 2012 to create Blink. It is reasonable to assume they have somewhat diverged since.

            • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              They’re developed separately. It’s a hard fork so I consider them different.

              • hddsx@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Man I haven’t been around that long but I feel like some of my knowledge is outdated and I have to start with “a long time ago in a galaxy far far away” because I stopped paying attention

              • Monomate@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                That’s also hugely in part because Apple develops Webkit at a snails pace. Some say they gimp their own rendring engine so that it isn’t competitive with native applications from the App Store. This way, there’s less incentive for developers to make web-apps to avoid the 30% app store tax.

      • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        21 hours ago

        What issues do people even have with firefox? Its a browser, it seems fast enough. Isn’t that all most people need from a browser

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I very much dislike Mozilla’s direction over the last decade. They’re introducing user-hostile features that subtly break normal browsing experience, even when disabled[0]. Not like Google is better, but I’m also trying to get away from Mozilla.

          [0] On Firefox Mobile, there’s a “feature” which makes the address bar auto-complete domains of companies paying Mozilla. I noticed this with Netflix - I never visit, but when I start writing a URL with n, roughly every 10th time Netflix was suggested. You can disable this feature, but this doesn’t actually disable it. The address bar no longer auto-completes with Netflix, instead it just doesn’t autocomplete! So 9/10 times I can write n and press Enter, but 1/10 times I press n and search for the letter n.

          Mozilla doesn’t care whether they break features, as long as they can make more money. I strongly dislike this approach by the supposedly “good” browser manufacturer.

          • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Do you have a good non chromium based alternative? To be clear I genuinely am asking those things make switching probably worth it considering how little of a hassle it is.

              • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                isn’t chromium under the Linux foundation now? Might look at the options on that side.

                • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 hours ago

                  No, it’s still 100% owned and 100% controlled by Google.

                  The Linux Foundation is just making it easier for people outside of Google to submit work to it.

                  Cynically, you could say that Google is just trying to get free contributions while retaining all the control. Optimistically you could say this is the first step in Google giving up control of Chromium in the far future, although currently they’ve given zero verbal or written indicators that they plan to do that.

              • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                This comment made me look into if KDE has one and apparently they do it even has built in ad blocking.

                Off to compile for 3 hours. /j

                • bss03@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Makes me remember when I used Konqueror with FF as a fallback before Chrome existed.

        • Prox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          No horizontal tab grouping. Tab groups on Chrome are perfect, and the Firefox tab extensions all suck in comparison.

          That said, I’m still using Firefox today because the internet is unusable without a good ad blocker.

          • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I still use the full screen tab groups feature that they removed from the core. I don’t like scrolling tabs, so I can just hit a button and click on the exact tab I want. I do probably have too many tabs open tbh.

        • Zier@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Too many people complain about the UI and claim it’s “outdated, ugly, unusable”. I find that funny because you can make FF look almost like anything you want, and I personally hate chrome’s UI.

          • enkers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Well, you USED to be able to, anyways, but they’ve slowly moved to a less customisable ui. Now you have to use extensions from outside websites to even do simple stuff like have a multi-row tab bar.

            Not to mention Firefox seems to break them every year or so.

          • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I’m one of those complaining about the UI. Used the TabMixPlus extension to adjust the UI to my liking. FF killed it. So, I started customizing the UI CSS. Every few versions, Mozilla changed the browser enough to invalidate my changes. After a while, I got tired of thiz and switched to Vivaldi, which is Chromium based.

        • krimson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I have no idea either. Sure, chrome is a little faster but its a minor difference in my opinion. Been using it for a long time and have no idea why it’s so unpopular.

          • enkers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Also, keep in mind, google has been caught slowing Firefox down in YouTube before. So if you notice any slowness in their services, it’s fair to suspect it might not be Firefox’s fault.

          • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Was Is a little faster.

            No way it stays that way after blocking ad-blocking. Some websites genuinely take over 30s without ad block.

        • Sheldan@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I advocate Firefox, but I must admit I personally am affected by regular crashes on Firefox desktop. Mostly when I enter a page I haven’t visited before (randomly though).

          I don’t know if others are affected by this, and I still recommend Firefox regardless, but every crash leaves a sour taste in my mouth. As it is not widespread, it might just be my setup, but still.

          • Zier@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            20 hours ago

            That’s not normal. You should go to the support pages and see if there is a fix. And it could be an addon causing the issue, not FF itself. I had that issue many years back.

          • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Thats really weird. I have never personally had the issue but it is more and fair enough to have issues with FF after that. I would recommend brave then, still chromium based but is actively doing things to make sure their adblock still works.

            • Sheldan@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              I dont have issues with FF in general which would cause me to stop using it, while it is frustrating, not using something chromium based still outweighs that heavily. Its kinda of a matter of principle to me. E: clarification

        • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          In Australia it won’t save card details. And it can’t natively create app shortcuts for things like Gmail, keep, whatsapp etc.

          I put up with it but it’s a pain compared to chrome and edge.

          • palordrolap@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            You could probably convince a third-party password storage program to store and auto-type details like that. Preferably one that doesn’t need internet access to work.

            • Stovetop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              KeePass allows offline password management, though I am not sure if it supports card/ID autofill.

              Bitwarden is mainly online only, but does support card/ID autofill and allows users to self-host their data if desired.

              Not overly familiar with other password managers, but it would not surprise me if one of them out there has the best of both worlds.

              • palordrolap@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Just double-checked with the help manual of the one I use (PasswordSafe) and it looks like it can do it. Never actually tried it though, which is one of the reasons I didn’t mention it previously.

                At the risk of sounding like an ad (I’m not affiliated, just a someone who found it in their Linux distro’s package manager), there are versions of it for pretty much any device. I definitely can’t vouch for the feature set(s) of the other versions, though.

    • nnullzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Thanks for this!! I became spoiled with Arc’s UI, but it’s a Chrome based browser. This looks like it’s the same experience without the bs.

      • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah. Zen is a bit newer and I’d say not quite as slick an experience yet, but it has come a long way in the last couple months and is getting very good

  • TIN@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I still find it interesting that the Vanadium browser in Grapheneos is Chromium based, with no possibility of extensions. I know this is for security reasons but it feels odd to still use chrome on my phone and Firefox everywhere else.

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I just use a Firefox derivative there as well, because of Ublock. Tried Vanadium but the adblocking was just not good.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Fennec right now, switched before Ironfox was out and now switching would be painful as there is no export, so all manual…

  • Varying9125@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What is everyone’s thoughts on duckduckgo browser? I’m on grapheme os and have always used Firefox on my desktop

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    21 hours ago

    go to brave, chrome has been pretty anti-adblock for a while. chromium might have a problem since it uses chrome store for extensions.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Brave has investments from A16Z, a VC fund that has been involved in multiple pump and dumps and shoes founders are fundamentally opposed to democracy and human rights.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s still the Chromium browser. Same problems, but now at the mercy of two corporations that are looking to turn a profit.