• Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Old Graphics =/= Bad Graphics

    edit: furthermore old =/= bad. Old is a quantitative measure and bad is qualitative. Trying to use one measure as the litmus for the other is like saying “there are five apples on that tree, they must taste terrible.”

    inb4: i dont care if it isnt a perfect analogy and there’s actually some study somewhere that showed that apple trees that retain prime number multiples of fruit on their branches statistically taste worse when rated on a blind taste test.

    • nesc@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not really? I would love to play complex game like df or cataclysm with good 3d graphics.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Shitty visual aesthetics has kept me from playing so many games from small devs, i don’t want their crappy pixel-graphics bullshit, I played those when I was a kid I don’t need that anymore now that we have the ability to do better…I don’t want one or the other, I want both. I would rather play a game with mediocre mechanics and great graphics than one with great mechanics and mediocre graphics.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    New games look like realistic pencil drawings that were smudged to shit.

    I literally have Elden Ring screenshots on my PS4 that look worse than Super Mario 64 screenshots.

    It’s like modern games all have a screen shader at the end specifically to fuck up the graphics and blur details. I know it’s TAA and friends but damn. It feels weird that so many games have broken graphics that only look good when taking promotional screenshots. And people call them good looking games lol

  • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    There’s a charm to early 3D. Late 2D is a timeless look, but early 3D is unmistakably mid 90s to early 2000s stuff.

    I’ve been running the original Resident Evil trilogy. The graphics age it, of course, but the games are just awesome. Resources are limited. You have to consider what’s worth wasting ammo on. You have to consider if you’ve done enough to justify a save. The puzzles aren’t terribly difficult, but they’re satisfying. And I love a good old fashioned jump scare.

    • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      More than cool, add in other enhancements and most 3D games don’t need a remaster that will most likely be bloated data-wise.

      Particularly when it comes to vertex colors (see Spyro’s skyboxes) rendering at modern res immaculately, upselling into photorealism is just throwing out the smartest and most unique thing the game had.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      not only based, but also gay.

      because gay is good, therefore the original point is good.

      edit: lemmy does not respect formatting 100%. I wanted larger gaps between sections.

  • Kataelyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Sometimes I play old games because of the graphics, not despite them. For nostalgia and the fact that my crappy laptop can handle them.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The bad graphics don’t bother me, but the control schemes on some of those old games are atrocious and really hard to control in 2025. Tried playing syphon filter and I was smashing into every wall

  • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I love chunky pixels and great gameplay. I love games that you can get hundreds of hours of fun out of, only take up 1gb of storage, and can run smooth on a dinosaur PC. No DRM, supporting a small team who respect you as a supporter and passionately make a piece of interactive art you get to enjoy the rest of your life.

    The graphics snobs have the worst brain dead takes man. Not being able to enjoy a game just because it ask you to use creativity and imagination to interpret the art that acompanies the interactive experience. But I guess to each their own. Who knows maybe in 20 years when their old favorite games look like shit their tune might change. In the meantime I hope they enjoy the 170gb weekly updates for the newest unoptimized reheated game franchise. I hear the newest version of the Ark dinosaur game is doing just great, I’m sure the next assassins creed and cod and whatever Bethesda is making in between skyrim releases will give you a novel and memorable experience.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Only 1GB. A lot of the good old games fit on a CD and had enough space left to have a full album of red book music!