The Portuguese Air Force is no longer expected to acquire the 5th generation F-35 fighter from Lockheed Martin, all due to the review of the US position towards NATO.

  • Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    4 months ago

    If we assume that Portugal would have ordered the same number as Czechia (a fellow European country with a pretty close GDP, population, and military budget that already bought F-35s) and take the flyaway cost on wikipedia of $82.500,000 as the price Portugal would have paid per plane, that’s $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn’t get

    • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      4 months ago

      that’s $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn’t get

      And that’s just the beginning.

      • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        4 months ago

        I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor’s bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor’s bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

          Honestly, I feel it’s more likely to display how much the defense industry is just another ordinary industry. They’ll whinge and wring their hands, maybe openly support the limpdick opposition if they’re feeling particularly pressured, but all that experience in making killing machines is just engineering and marketing. They’re not more likely to have clout or death squads (of their own, at least) than other major industries of comparable size and importance, and everything is structured in such a compartmentalized way that they couldn’t really leverage that against the government if they actually wanted to throw down.

          The defense industry is more like the oil industry than a cyberpunk future. Influential, not independent.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            4 months ago

            The funniest possible outcome of this would be Lockheed Martin starting up a Tesla competitor

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            They’re not more likely to have clout or death squads (of their own, at least) than other major industries of comparable size and importance, and everything is structured in such a compartmentalized way that they couldn’t really leverage that against the government if they actually wanted to throw down.

            now if they have influence over the military… That’s what starts coups.

        • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Fucking with a defense contractor’s

          Good point. Hadn’t really thought of it that way. What an enormous mess…

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Portugal would probably have bought more, since we have a large area of the Atlantic Ocean that needs to be patrolled not only by sea, but also by air.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        You also gotta make sure nobody tries to steal the Azores for their beautiful nature.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 months ago

        Disclaimer in that I am not in any way an expert on military procurement: it depends on what they buy.

        There are three European planes that can do similar roles: the Typhoon (Anglo-German-Italian), the Rafale (French), and the Gripen (Swedish). According to this RUSI article, it looks like the Typhoon is probably actually more expensive per plane. The Typhoon was also, unlike the other two and the F-35, designed to be a pure air superiority fighter, so it’s more of an F-22 competitor than an F-35 one. Probably not what Portugal is looking for. That RUSI article has the Rafale as being a bit more expensive than the F-35 and the Gripen being a bit cheaper than it. However, the source for the F-35’s number is the flyaway cost for the Americans, who did ordered it in huge numbers and also did most (not all, but most) of the development and I would assume get a better deal than others. Further, it’s in an article headlined “F-35’s price might rise, Lockheed warns”. So I’m just going to hedge my bets and say:

        • If they buy the Typhoon, definitely no, but the Typhoon probably isn’t the right fit anyway
        • If they buy the Rafale, somewhere around the same, and it’ll still be extremely capable
        • If they buy the Gripen, yes, and it’ll still be very good but not quite individually capable as the other options
        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          That’s all well and good, but you’re also missing a critical point.

          The European Union is very likely to introduce a bill that will massively subsidize purchases of local (EU) military equipment. This will make all EU alternatives much, much more attractive than F-35s.

          This is a great move by the EU - it drives a lot of military spending away from the US and into the local economies, while shoring up its own security as well as preventing being at the hands of a fickle fascist for maintenance and upgrades.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Which in turn will probably also help with economies of scale, making the ex-subsidy cost of that equipment go down.

        • baerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 months ago

          For once, our (Croatian) government lucked into making a good choice when they went with Rafales instead of F-16Vs.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            Uhh, don’t expect any special insights here

            It looks to me like it’s pretty impressive considering that it’s the second combat plane ever built in the country, and the experience gained from that is a valuable thing.

            I have to assume that it’s less capable and less expensive than the four that I mentioned, based on how it has fared as an export. It seems to have struggled against the European, American, and Chinese offerings, or in many cases have been considered as a trainer by countries that are already flying one of those previously-mentioned ones. Obviously there’s a lot of politics involved in these purchases, but if Australia has already bought F-35s and wants Tejases as trainers then it suggests that Australia has a good reason to think that Tejas is a lot less expensive and also less effective at actually fighting a war

            It seems like it suits its role well, though - a cost-effective solution for India’s needs, and a way to develop domestic expertise

    • Delta_V@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      4 months ago

      US MIC: “I wish the Feds would buy more guns and less butter.”

      *monkey paw curls*

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      For them it is easier, because as I understand they didn’t sign any contract yet, just were planning to.

  • muddyuk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why would anybody feel they can rely on American hardware anymore? Any country with any sense won’t be beholden to them as an ally now thanks to that idiotic mango.

  • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    4 months ago

    Portugal was lucky to get quite late aboard the F35 ship, as they decided about it as late as April 2024. Finland, where I’m from, was one of the earliest ones, deciding about the procurement in late 2022. Some other ones, as told by Wikipedia:

    Canada: Jan 2023 Czechia: Jan 2024 Germany: 2023 Greece: Delivery 2027, so ordered probably in late 2023 or so? Poland: 2020, apparently some already delivered? Romania: November 2024 Singapore: Early 2024 Switzerland: delivery from 2027, so probably ordered in late 2023?

    The further the procurement process, the more money might get wasted if the order has to be cancelled. Would still make sense to cancel, though, because a weapon you are free to use as long as there is no war is just a heap of scrap metal. It does not matter how much money we’ve already spent on the scrap metal, we should not put a cent more.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yeah I got a sneaking suspicion that LMC’s gonna see a ton of options getting dropped and orders cancelled. Our government is not to be trusted. We’ll use that shit as leverage at some point.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Money well spent. But, frankly, who is that 500 million to? What happens if… They just don’t pay? I mean, Trump is very familiar with just not paying bills owed, maybe Canada should just… Return in kind?

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          Even business-wise and strictily obbeying the contract conditions, paying 500 million for nothing still makes more business sense that paying billions for what will become inactive-plane-shaped pieces of metal if Canada ever needs to defend itself against the only country that geographically is in a position of actually invading it.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Or, just ignore it, pay 0, and see if the US has the stones to try and do anything about it.

            Spoiler, we dont.

    • Darkmoon_UK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Mate I dislike JS as much as anyone but there’s no need to bring it in here.

  • b0s@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    Got to speed up the European 6th gen fighter development

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yea, imagine getting a brand-new fleet of F-35s and then king trump wakes up and has them bricked to blitz-annex the Azores.

  • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    As they should. I’ll tell you that as an American you shouldn’t trust the US government.

  • PNW_Doug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Good for them. It’s clear that we (the U.S.) can no longer be trusted to act in good faith.