• BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Public Service Announcement: The Right to Free Speech means the government can’t arrest you for what you say. It doesn’t mean that anyone else has to listen to your bullshit, or host you while you share it. The 1st Amendment doesn’t shield you from criticism or consequences. If you’re yelled at, boycotted, have your show canceled, or get banned from an Internet community, your free speech rights aren’t being violated. It’s just that the people listening think you’re an asshole, And they’re showing you the door. https://xkcd.com/1357/

    Relatedly, the people who are the most upset about censorship when no one listens to them never remember the other right that goes along with free speech: Freedom of Association. That means that you can mutually choose to listen, platform support OR NOT with whomever you wish.

  • fr0g@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People not wanting to engage with other people is not censorship. Nobody is entitled to someone else’s attention.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    lolno

    You can say whatever the fuck you want, but other people aren’t obliged to listen to it or pass it on.

    Talk to the hand.

    • small44@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      People aren’t obliged to listen to it but they have no right to prevent other people from seeing or hearing it unless it’s stuffs like hate speech and racism

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, you’re saying that if I have a conversation with my friend, and I don’t let you listen in, THAT’S censorship? You have a problem with not being able to invade my privacy?

        Sorry you got kicked out of whatever cool kids club it was, but you were not censored.

        • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The correct analogy would be someone else trying to prevent you from having a conversation with your friend.

            • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              People are unable see content from other people that their instance has defederated with. (Yes, you can have an account on multiple instances, but that kind of defeats the point of federation.)

              • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                So, the inconvenience of having to go from one openly available source of information to ANOTHER openly available source of information, is the same as an authority figure preventing someone from speaking their own opinions?

                If you say so. 🤷🏻‍♂️

                • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why should an instance get to choose what its users can read? That feels similar to a government deciding what their citizens can read.

      • MapleEngineer@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one is preventing anyone from hearing it. You are free to create an account on those instances and listen to them if you want.

        • small44@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are also free to join facebook alternative yet people complains about censorship on it and defending it on lemmy. You are just hypocrites

          • MapleEngineer@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Freedom of speech almost always comes with freedom of association. The thing that many people miss is that freedom of association also allows you to choose NOT to associate with someone just as freedom of religion includes freedom FROM religion. The instances choosing to defederated from the trolls are exercising their right to be free from association with the trolls. No one is stopping the trolls from spewing their nonsense or stopping anyone who wants to listen from listening.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    A server operator who chooses to federate or not federate another server is well within their rights to do so. Their server, their rules. If you don’t like it just browse the defederated server yourself, no one is stopping you.

    It’s like visiting someone’s house and complaining they don’t have organic coffee. If they don’t have organic coffee they aren’t stopping you from getting organic coffee, they just choose not to have it.

  • Wolf Link 🐺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    After looking through the comments here, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you just don’t understand what you’re saying, because you seem to be under the impression that “defederating” means that noone that isn’t subscribed to the defederating instance will have access to the content anymore. (e.g. Instance A cuts ties with Instance B and C so people with accounts on Instance B and C can no longer read what is published on Instance A)

    This is not how it works.

    You can browse all instances without even having an account on any of them so absolutely noone loses access to anything. The only thing you temporarily(!) lose is the ability to WRITE anything on the defederated instance, but you can just make an account there anytime you want.

    So when Instance A cuts ties with Instance B and C, people with accounts on A can no longer WRITE anything in communities on B and C, but everyone can still READ everything, and if you happen to have an account on Instance B and want to write something on Instance A, you can just create an account there.

    Spending ten seconds on creating an account is not censorship.

    • NightOwl@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, and Connect for Lemmy on Android has a really wonderful setting where you can browse other instances without an account and view communities that are local to it. Apps make it easier to handle accounts too now. Liftoff has been the best in that area.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Boo hoo, people aren’t being forced to put up with my stupid shit, waah!”

  • NightOwl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really. These aren’t monetized sites, but just individuals inviting guests to use their instance over self hosting their own, and there’s other instances people can move to.

    Each instance is better seen as individual forums than a reddit type centralized site. Some forums allows cross account logins, and some you have to create another account. And defederation doesn’t cause that instance to cease to exist like banning a community or subreddit does.

    • small44@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Money is not the only reason why people/ businesses want to censor stuffs. It can also be because of politics or ideology

  • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Get fucked.

    It’s our right to live in a safe environment without Nazi fucks.

    You have an entitlement to speech, you’re not required to be heard or listened to by me.

    • small44@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who the hell talked about nazis.I’m with censoring hate speech and i don’t believe in total free speech. Did beehaw defederated with lemmy.world becauae of nazis? Yes you don’t have to listen to anybody but you have no right to decide for other what to see. That’s why i’m against defederation and with the ability of individual users to block whatever they want