• wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      3 months ago

      Best thing is, they introduced some settings to turn that auto-conversion off and they don’t work 🤣 can’t make that stuff up.

      • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean, I know of a Microsoft product that allows for a batch import of data provided in an Excel file. You need to use their template file. Which, when used, automatically formats all dates the American way, ignoring your locale settings. Depending on which date is first encountered on import (e.g. which date you entered in the first line) then designates whether the whole file is imported with dates read as MM/DD/YYYY or DD/MM/YYYY.

        You start your list on January 1st? It will import everything as MM/DD/YYYY then. You start you list on e.g. January 22nd? DD/MM/YYYY it is then. Good luck getting that import running without errors…

      • mmddmm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nothing works in Excel. Excel will do what it wants.

        But that doesn’t stop the MS support and a thousand stupid people from claiming “oh, you just have to format it as text, are you dumb or what”…

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Not OP, but let’s make this better:

    PS: i doubt anyone here would honestly say “damn, that’s beyond my skill”, which goes to show that “not everyone can draw” is a bullshit argument for using AI to make comics

  • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, for a community (lemmy) that wanted to get away from corporate stuff (reddit) it pains me to see how even the most basic thing to draw is being delegated to Ai (corporations).

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve come to the conclusion in the last couple weeks I simply can’t identify AI images anymore. I have no clue what about this makes everyone call it out as AI, and there’s have been many such instances of this happening with me lately. I’m going to get modern day Nigerian princed when I’m older I can feel it in my bones

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        The reason this one is blatant AI is that the imagery doesn’t make any sense. Why is the glass of water itself the optimist?

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Same here. I did not think twice about this picture or a few other posts in the past and yet there are pitchforks in the comments and I think to myself “What are you all on about?”. I rue how unrecognizable AI “slop” has gotten.

      • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        A year ago ai couldn’t even make any sort of recognisable text, now it can do it flawlessly

        • callouscomic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Left person also missing an arm. The shapes seem too perfect, like too circular, distance between them too. Their arms also ho into the line, which is a table?

          It’s all just so odd.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      thing to draw is being delegated to Ai (corporations).

      But, not all AI is corporate run, there’s plenty of AI models to choose from that are open source including image generation models

      And actually, image generation models are much easier to run on “affordable” consumer hardware than LLMs

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Which model did you use to generate this, and what tool did you use?

        • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sorry for the misunderstanding, this was a crosspost, I didn’t generate it. But image searching shows a few matches elsewhere, so I doubt who I crossposted it from generated it either

    • Alpha71@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hate this take. Not everyone can afford to pay for art or have the ability to draw.People need to get off AI’s back and instead of complaining, figure out how to deal with it. Because it’s not going anywhere.

      • Demdaru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        You are aware that even if you make stickmans, people will appreciate it if the meme is good, right?

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Don’t talk about ability to draw as though it’s some sort of elitist trait denied to the working class. People who can draw can do so because they put the hours in.

        If you can’t be bothered putting the effort in when expressing yourself, why the hell should anyone else be interested in what you have to say?

        • Bio bronk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t have enough time to learn I have to work to try and live the bleak few hours of life I get to myself a week. honestly with AI our bosses expect more it’s slowing down

          • skisnow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You have my sympathies, but that still doesn’t mean you get to post complete nonsensical garbage where a glass of water is talking for no reason, that took you less effort to create than it did to read, and expect people to not tell you to jog on, when there’s a whole wealth of creative artists out there who are putting in the energy but getting their space flooded with slop.

            The web has objectively become much, much worse in the past 12 months because quality is getting drowned out by quantity.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              but that still doesn’t mean you get to post complete nonsensical garbage where a glass of water is talking for no reason

              How dare Dali paint pictures with melting clocks! If the clocks really were hot enough to melt, they would set the tree they’re melting on ablaze!!!11

              I get it. Artists are afraid of their income. But with those kinds of takes, “AI bad because surrealism” I can’t take you seriously as an artist so I guess nothing would be lost.

              • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Surrealism is not nonsense. It has a purpose, even if that purpose is hard to tell. If you think Dali and AI slop is the same, you don’t understand either.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Fine. If it’s offending your senses too much to be tame surrealism, call it dada. If you think that replacing a person with an object cannot be an artistic choice, you… well, haven’t seen much art.

                  Note that I’m not arguing for or against AI here. I’m saying that your critique of AI is slop.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Because the idea behind it is good? You’re confusing art and craft. Why should anyone be interested in a urinal on a pedestal? The work is defined not by whether or not you can buy its physical representation in any random hardware store, I thought we had that one figured out.

          Also there’s literally zero people who would pay someone a commission to draw this piece. You’re not looking at lost work you’re looking at additional art. Without AI (if it is AI) it might have still existed but in stick figure form and that would be better because…? The idea has better expression as a chicken scratch? I don’t think so.

      • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        AI is like a housefire. Nobody wants it. Nobody needs it. It’s just a bad thing, and if someone sees it, they’re more than justified in being upset and trying to get rid of it. Don’t defend the fire, or you’ll be the first to burn.

  • sus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    it’s funny how you can tell at a glance exactly what model generated this image, just based off the background color

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Someone explain to me why i have a sense for ai? This is like the fourth time this week i see an ai image and i spotted it even tho at first i hadnt seen the mistakes the ai made. Something just feels off in ai pictures and i cant really pin down what it is. But when i see one i can just spot it for some reason.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        The glass is also weirdly large considering it looks like it should be at roughly the same distance as the people.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s become such a reliable tell that I’m genuinely curious why AI seems to think that cartoon images MUST look like they’re drawn on old paper.

        EDIT: The AI answer I got when asking Google was about what I’d expect, but this last bit I hadn’t considered:

        Sepia tones can help unify the color palette of an image, making it more visually cohesive and pleasing. This could be a factor in the AI’s decision to use sepia, as it can contribute to a sense of order and harmony in the generated image.

        So it uses it to try and make it more visually appealing to a wide audience, leading to it looking even more bland and uninspired.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s also some artifacting around the lines that are reminiscent of JPEG, but not kind of that, and it seems like the text is superimposed onto it in a second or third pass by an external tool to make it look more consistent.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yesterday I laughed at this, today Excel stripped leading zeros from a sheet of UPCs and converted them to floating point.

    Also format as Text apparently means nothing