The Trump administration can’t immediately revoke the deportation protections and work permits of hundreds of thousands of migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela who entered the U.S. legally under a Biden-era program, a federal judge ruled Monday.

U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani blocked the Trump administration from moving forward with its plan to terminate the legal status of those migrants on April 24. The administration had warned those affected by its announcement that they would need to self deport by that date or face arrest and deportation by federal immigration agents.

But Talwani suspended the deportation warnings the government had sent and prohibited officials from revoking the legal protection, known as immigration parole, that the Biden administration granted to more than half a million Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans.

  • ray@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    4 months ago

    Tomorrow’s headline: Trump revokes legal status of migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          His orders can be struck down? You mean like the two times they defied court orders just today, and one of them was a unanimous SCOTUS ruling, with this Court?

          That’s the freedom from judicial authority he was given.

          • Lawdoggo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            The SCOTUS ruling you’re referring to, while still a terrible precedent as a matter of policy, did not give him a blanket legal right to disregard court orders. He’s just doing it anyway.

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              Maybe not technically, but it effectively did. There’s no material difference.

              You’re falling prey to the idea that in theory, theory and practice are identical, but in practice, theory and practice can often diverge sharply.

            • Nougat@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              If he is immune from criminal prosecution for “official acts”, it is fully legal for him to defy court orders about “official acts”. That ruling gave him unchecked power. That ruling was our Enabling Act.

            • Nougat@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              If they’re doing it, then they have the freedom to do it, until something actually stops them.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    The courts are irrelevant. I guess they might as well keep doing their thing, but they’ll just be ignored.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    But can the court stop his Gestapo from kidnapping these people anyway and trafficking them for torture, slavery, imprisonment and possibly execution? Because they’re just doing it regardless of what the courts rule.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    So?

    He’ll deport them and get a slap on the wrist and a strongly worded letter from a judge that he’ll ignore.

    And no one will do anything about it.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    It is disgusting that the Orange Turd gets to decide what happens to these people. He should be in jail instead of in the white house.

  • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Judges also ruled that he couldn’t black-bag legal residents and citizens and send them to prison camps in El Salvador. He ignored the judges and did it anyway. Judges then said he had to return the people he kidnapped. He ignored them again.

    A law is only a law if it is enforced. Until I see that fat orange fuck being perp walked through the Rose Garden in handcuffs, laws don’t mean shit.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Trump: deports them anyway.

    Autocrat gonna autocrat. He’s pretty much established he doesn’t care what the courts say, and his ICE Stasi don’t care either.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Trump can do whatever the fuck he wants, because nobody is actually doing anything to stop him other than meekly posting on social media and waving some signs around. Democracy and the rule of law was always sketchy at best in the US, but it’s been dead for months now. And no amount of adorable weekend protests that are sanctioned by the cops are gonna change that.

    If you aren’t getting tear gassed, shot at, and imprisoned, you’re being allowed to throw a tantrum to keep you from doing anything useful, and your actions are performative at best.