• FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I still have and will continue to purchase TVs for as long as I can. Not smartTVs.

    As a side note, I went to Best Buy and asked them about non-smartTVs. They literally said they had 2 models. A small, tiny TV and a larger TV which they did not have a model on the floor. They would have to bring it out or I would have to go the back.

  • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I got a Samsung TV a couple of years ago. I use it with a Roku. It’s not on my network. I’ll keep it until it stops working because I think eventually TVs will refuse to work without an Internet connection.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sad people buy more to try to make themselves happy. Retail therapy.

      People who serve ads have a vested interest in knowing when you’re unhappy and what makes you unhappy, so they can capitalise on it.

  • TON618@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Leveraging people’s property to trash their privacy and serve them ads is really a good way to get me to avoid an entire brand for everything.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree, but with TVs (or large displays" we’re at the point where there are no good options. Commercial displays are over engineered for the home and lag in technology Vs home TVs. So they’re not an option. Lg and Samsung are the display technology leaders, but their TVs are full of crap— so no. Monitors don’t go large enough for the living room.

      Guess I’m stuck with what I have.

      • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Monitors are still bigger than TVs our parents had in our childhood, no way I’m buying such a surveillance machine just for a bigger screen.

      • sinceasdf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Why would you ever accept this anti consumer bullshit for a slightly better screen? It might not even take a year before the current cutting edge not “the best” anymore with how fast tech cycles. I would absolutely go out of my way to get a device I can deprive of an Internet connection and still use.

      • Bwilder@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Huh, I’ve heard that commercial displays are the way to go. What do you mean when you say they are over engineered?

        • Not a replicant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          They’re designed and built to run 16/7 or similar. If you have TV on 16 hours a day, a commercial display is worth considering.

          No, I’m not joking - I’ve seen folk who turn it on at sunrise, and off at bedtime.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re industrial boxes with a screen. Not aesthetically what I want in my living room. The displays are chosen for their longevity, not their picture quality. They’re often actively cooled with fans, so adding a noise level to their operation.

        • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You can get them now days up to 360hz refresh rate. Gaming projectors and projectors in general have came a long way from the faded blurry shit they were 10 to 15 plus years ago.

  • PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Never connect your tv to WiFi

    Don’t buy connected anything

    Just buy things that do the thing you want.

    No consumer ever asked for a smart tv

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 days ago

    Continue to never buy LG products again?

    Gotcha. The advertising works, i guess…maybe not how they wanted to, though lol

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh, they do have products without all that shit. They offer large screen monitors that are basically their TVs without the “smart” part.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        i wager it has all the TV stuff gutted out, including the tuner… Which admittedly is only a problem if you use OTA and not cable.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          They have a bunch of display ports and HDMIs. You can buy the tuner you need (SAT, OTA, cable, other streamer), or use a PC&Linux and watch YT add-free.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      My next TV will be either a business/signage monitor or a computer monitor.
      At least something without any connection outside. No network, no anything.
      At most something like a Chromecast or similar.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          You can still set up your own HTPC in your living room and configure it yourself.
          And there are more solutions like from Apple (but they absolutely fucking track you as well) or other streaming box/stick solutions I am not aware of.
          Unsure how good an Nvidia Shield is in regards to privacy. Your best bet for privacy is probably to just build your own solution on Linux.

          • sinceasdf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Nvidia is huge on producing AI and is certainly data-hungry. Without actually knowing, I would bet it’s about as bad as anything else. Since all your data is passing directly through their servers it’s trivial for them to do whatever they want with it.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    You know back in the day they were like easily half a dozen custom Android ROMs for any given phone. I’m pretty sure that there’s still a diversity of ROMs available.

    Why is this not the case with televisions?

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is actually about analysing the shows you watch, so it’s invasive, but not insidious in the way, say, the screenshots of hdmi content is.

  • deepfuckingdumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have a TCL Roku TV and holy shit it was engineered to deliver ads. If it is not connected to the network, the power LED blinks and is very annoying. The power LED is right next to the IR receiver and can’t just be taped over. Assigning a manual IP and DNS is blocked so traffic can’t be routed through a pihole. I use the Jellyfin app on the TV so it needs local network access. At this point the damn thing needs to have traffic managed at a network level firewall. I don’t have the hardware for the firewall at the moment but now that Roku has pop up ads for simply moving around the app menu (yes really), I may need to get on that.

    • TipRing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      if your router is able to you can set up ACLs to allow the TV access to your network but not the internet.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      but now that Roku has pop up ads for simply moving around the app menu

      Huh? I have 3 Roku Ultras, a Roku Stick, and a Roku TV and none of them do that. Have you gone into the Roku settings menu recently and checked your advertising settings?

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah, they’re doing A/B testing currently for their next several waves of ads. I think (but don’t quote me on this) I read that in the new EULA.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That sucks. If I can’t control the ads with settings, dns fuckery, or firewalling then I guess I’ll leave their ecosystem.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Indeed. I’m saving up for a dumb tv with an HTPC, and hopefully will get it deployed before that nonsense comes my way.

  • brot@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 days ago

    Let’s be honest: I, as a customer, want to make informed buying decisions. I want to buy food that is tasty and maybe is healthy, but not based on some image that some marketing guys want to push. I want to choose the car which is best (and cheapest) for my purposes, and don’t want to be hearded into buying something else. I want to choose the best insurance for me and not be mislead by some emotional ad showing me a happy family.

    And I really do not want to be manipulated in an emotional vulnerable moment so that I buy something. That’s shady as fuck

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    4 days ago

    I recently bought an LG TV. I didn’t connect it to the Internet, I just use it with my Chromecast or Switch. Works great, no ads, no AI BS.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I find it highly likely that TVs will soon cease to function without an internet connection, complete with some BS explanation about protecting your privacy or security.

        • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I can’t set my dryer to medium heat unless I do so with an app over the internet even though the controls exist to do it on the unit. I bought a window AC unit and the only remote control is an app - thankfully I was able to put that on a subnet with no internet gateway and it still works.

          • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            36
            ·
            4 days ago

            Name them. Bosch does this with some functions too. I bought the model below and didn’t care about delayed start or whatever. I am not loading your app!

            I swear we need to start some appliance hacking clubs or something to sidestep this crap.

            • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              Neither mentioned a network connection was required. The AC unit didn’t mention it at all, and consumer reports mentioned the dryer had “smart features” and an app but never said basic controls were locked behind a network connection

        • pc486@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Broadcast TV is already going that way. ATSC 3 requires an internet connection to get decoding keys. For your protection, of course.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I mean, a camera is an easy thing to block, as long as you’re aware of it, understand the implications, and have the desire to block it. Just obstruct the lens. Roll of black electrical tape, put a strip over it, done. Now, most people out there may not actually do so…

        Only becomes an issue if other services that you actually want are tied to the camera, or if the TV refuses to operate without a usable picture of the viewer or something.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Some TVs already have the ability to connect to sidewalk. More worrying is that every newer “Smart” TV has the ability to cast to it so if anyone ever does that using an internet connected device like a SmartPhone then bam…your TV just got an internet connection and can now send out stored data and potentially grab a firmware update.

        Surprise!

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Luckily my neighbors are way out of WiFi range and there is barely enough cell service here to send a text from inside the house.

    • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is the way to do it

      I blocked my lg from the Wi-Fi after i got a “Kobe Bryant memorial” ad, while playing on my switch… TF?!

      • 5in1k@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Do you think he thought avoiding all that traffic was worth it as he plummeted?

        • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Okay so fuck rich people destroying the planet with private air travel—however, he was still statistically more likely to die from driving that day. And so was his daughter and the other innocent kids on that flight

    • aubertlone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve heard this line many times from so many people.

      So basically just Nintendo and google profit off your personal information? And doesn’t Chromecast serve ads? In the background, but still?

      I fully support your decision to not connect your LG TV to the internet. I do the same thing but it’s often just for convenience. I get better performance from my devices rather than from the TV itself for whatever application.

      Just was thinking about that recently is all.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you want a serious mind fuck read “stand On Zanzibar” a science fiction novel from 1969.

    One of the things that the writer predicted was Mr. & Mrs. Everywhere, a gimmick where your TV would insert your family into advertisements.

    The novel is full of other, equally accurate predictions…