cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoJavaScriptlemmy.mlimagemessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up1920arrow-down114
arrow-up1906arrow-down1imageJavaScriptlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-squarecapybara@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down6·2 months agoThis is fair enough from an idealistic view. In practice, you don’t want your entire website to shit itself because of a potentially insignificant error.
minus-squareJankatarch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoIn practice runtime errors are a bitch to find and fix.
minus-squarecapybara@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoFair enough. This is why people prefer typescript
minus-squarerandom8847@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoI’d rather have my website shit itself than have silent difficult to find errors.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoLook! I bought this for free on capybaras website, there’s a glitch! capybara: at least it didn’t throw an error. / jk 😁
minus-squarecapybara@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·2 months agoUse typescript if you’re paranoid about this
This is fair enough from an idealistic view. In practice, you don’t want your entire website to shit itself because of a potentially insignificant error.
In practice runtime errors are a bitch to find and fix.
Fair enough. This is why people prefer typescript
I’d rather have my website shit itself than have silent difficult to find errors.
Use typescript
Look! I bought this for free on capybaras website, there’s a glitch!
capybara: at least it didn’t throw an error.
/ jk 😁
Use typescript if you’re paranoid about this