Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions at a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations.

Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief.

In one back-and-forth, Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has developed plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      As long as you’re counting location as a resource. Ex. Cuba was an advantageous location for the Soviet Union during the cold war.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Idk, the gdp of Greenland is only 3b a year and it’s mostly from fishing. There’s really nothing the US could extract from Greenland that would be worth the cost of invading it. There’s some potential for mining, but you’d have to build an entire infrastructure to do it, and we don’t even want to invest in building infrastructure in the US.

      Realistically the only thing that makes Greenland strategically important would be controlling the shipping lanes up north. However, the only strategically significant rival we have that utilizes those shopping lanes are Russia, whom the administration wants to buddy up too.

      I think it’s just meat they throw out to the media anytime they want to distract from their failures, and of course our pathetic press just gobbles it up every time.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        However, the only strategically significant rival we have that utilizes those shopping lanes are Russia, whom the administration wants to buddy up too.

        If that doesn’t play out, Putin will be dropped like Saddam.

      • SupaTuba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s because of climate change. Rich Americans+that pretend climate change isn’t real) want to go there to bug out.

      • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Lots of great reasons that aren’t the actual reason.

        Greenland is very big on the map, and if it was apart of the United States then the US would look so big on the map.

        Everyone says Trajan was the best roman emperor because the roman empire had the largest amount of territory under him, ergo if Greenland or Canada became part of the US then everyone would say the same thing about Trump.

        That is the only reasoning behind this obsession.