I just got a new laptop today and when I saw the ssd it blew my mind. Most of my old drives are like the second from left and it’s what I think of as a normal drive, buying a standard ssd still feels small to me. But look at that tiny thing to the right! It’s the size of a postage stamp!
Assuming I managed to find the right specs (it is a Microscience hh-1050): The monster on the far left is from 1990, holds 40mb, read/write of 0.625mb/s, and weighs almost exactly 2kg. The baby on the far right I got in the mail today, holds 1tb, read/write of 5150mb/s, and weighs about 2.85 grams.
So we’re looking at 25,000 times more storage, 8,240 times faster, and 1/700th the weight! And the one on the right is just 1tb, they make one that same model but 2tb. I can barely believe it exists even though I’m literally holding it in my hands.
I’ve got a full-height 5 1/4" 1GB hard drive around here. Thing is massive.
I’ve also got most of the storage devices I’ve ever used over the decades:
- 5 1/4" floppy
- 3 1/2" floppy
- 4mm DAT tape
- 8mm DAT tape
- 1/4" QIC tape
- Zip disk
- Cassette tape
- Punched tape
I’m missing the following:
- DLT tape
- 8" floppy
- IBM 2315 disk pack
Never used 9-track tapes, punch cards, or removable disk multipacks.
You need a Jazz drive and a mean looking 20mb MFM hard drive that didn’t have auto parking.
I’ve actually got a little stack of punch cards. It’s a program my dad wrote when he was in college, he gave it to me when I started programming
It’s a bit misleading, you could have used an sd card long ago
The left most one is also an HDD? It looks like what I imagine a tape drive would look like but searching for them shows very different results lol
Its actually a smaller one too. Those 5 1/4 HDDs could be 2 bays tall.
For tape look up LTO or LTO-WORM.
That is the current industry standard (afaik).
5MB of storage in 1956.
Imagine the smug face of the first adopters of 3.5" disks, thinking it would easily fit on 4 floppies! Heck, even 15x5.25" ones are so much smaller…
That would hold 1.66 copies of war and peace.
They could’ve just compressed it using 7zip. Text files compress really small!
/j
A space ship descends and lands outside my door, and and a benevolent Alien pops out and hands me a 512 MB USB stick.
“I crafted this for your species, and made sure it’s compatible with your hardware standards. It contains the sum total knowledge of all life in the universe and can be used to accelerate your species to the next plane of existence.”
I thank him tearfully and he departs with a warm smile, ascending back up into the soon-to-be-knowable cosmos from when he came.
I plug the stick into my machine, and check out the directory. Inside are two files:
105 MB knowledge.tar.piidx 328 KB README.txtI open up the readme file to learn more about the PIIDX file format so that I can uncompress the sum total knowledge of all existence. General gist:
- Uses a compression algorithm with an infinite dictionary based on prime numbers
- Uses a storage/retrieval algorithm based on the digits of Pi
Realise quickly that the file will never be opened in my lifetime
Once you have one copy on there it would be awfully wasteful to fill the rest up with a 0.66 copy though.
And Apple be like. 128gb HDD or upgrade to a 512gb SSD for $600 extra or a 1tb nvme for $1000 extra
Their customers buy it, so they arent changing that
You’ve never shopped for a MacBook before I take it.
You’ve never met a pro user who loves Apple products before have you? They just buy the upgrades they need (and more) without blinking an eye. Since it’s a business expense anyway, the $2000 in upgrades is a rounding error when the machine will be used for several years.
1tb macbook user here. I have and I can confirm it to be true.
lack of education is Apple’s bread and butter.
That’s Windows users, Apple at least has to make it difficult for users to install something else
Apple livea on the notion of ‘a fool and his money are soon parted’ and can you blame them? They are one of, if not the, most profitable companies around. If it works why change it.
Wait, 1tb?
You’re leaving impact on the table, I have plenty of 1tb micro SD cards.
Those drives typically have some pretty dreadful read/write speeds (for a computer). Maybe once SD Express is figured out we’ll get fast and good Micro SD cards at a high capacity.
And they crap out so quickly. I can’t even count the number of SD cards I’ve had to throw in the trash. I don’t think I’ve ever had a 2.5" or 3.5" drive completely crap out on me (though I have had bad SMART data indicative of a dying drive) and I have been running a media server with dozens of TBs for over a decade now.
I mean, those work fine and are fast. You mean we’ll get those for cheap.
In any case, the image is about physical dimensions, and SD cards are tiny! Considering we’re comparing to a 40 MB mechanical drive, I’m gonna say the comparison is valid and they aren’t even near the bottom of the specs table.
Of course people like it when ALL the specs get better in these things, but that’s because people like simple things more than true things.
Apples and oranges, though. The left two are hard drives, the right two are solid state drives (ie flash memory). They kind of serve the same purpose, but there is quite a big step in between 2 and 3. 2.5" HDDs also exist, though. Then again, so do 1TB MicroSD cards. And 2280 M.2 SSDs. But also huge tapes that are still in use for backup purposes.
There were even smaller hard drives. The iPod used a 1.8in drive.
But we’re on Lemmy so everything Apple does is bad!
Ahh yes, I remember my first Seagate ST225. A whopping 20 MB of storage for the low low price of 800 bucks.
Same first hard drive I bought! Crazy we both remembered the model number too. Got mine in 1990 so not $800 I don’t believe, but regardless it was all I could afford after buying the 8087 math coprocessor too!
Forgot about copro. Everyone and their dog had to have it back then.
I remember all the formats shown.
My first machine was an AST Research 286 16Mhz (in “turbo” mode) with two 5-1/4" floppy drives, and a 40 MB 5-1/4" hard drive. I paid ~$2000 for it in the late 80s. That was a good move, I knew more about computers than most people applying for jobs at the time, and that allowed me to make a decent living without a college degree.
How to say you are over 50 without saying you are over 50. I’m a A little younger, so in the 90s 20MB drive wasn’t $2000. First time I had Ms dos boot from a hdd instead of floppy. The first time I ever ‘installed’ was f16 fighting falcon. The loading speed was phenomenal for the time.
I remember being astounded by the 8GB backup tapes that fit in my shirt pocket.
Is that NVME only half length still with a full TB? It almost looks to be the same size as an M.2 wifi adapter. Crazy that they’re getting this small.
I recently bought two cheaper 1TB NVME and have some premium ones from several years ago but they’re all the full 80mm length. I have yet to come across ones this small personally.
2280 seems to be the most common DIY size, 2230 is common for business machines, sometimes in an adapter to fit a normal 2.5" HDD bay or a slot large enough for 2280. I just removed one from the 2280 adapter last week to get data off after the storm came through the east coast.
The fact that those measurements are in inches when “2280” means 22mm x 80mm agitates me.
When the measurement is already in the designation, the only point to adding information is for “translation.” It would irk me if someone felt the need to point out a 2280 was 80 mm long while a 2230 was only 30 mm long. I mean it’s already in the name…
I mean I appreciate the mention or else I wouldn’t have learned it
Welcome to merica!
They are more limited in storage space than the 2280s but yeah the thing is tiny, almost 1/3 length even at 30mm. It’s literally the size of a postage stamp I’m stunned
There’s terabyte SD cards now, that are almost that fast.
Oldest hard drives I’ve dealt with were 4RU. Those systems also had me attaching reels of tape with write enable rings.
It really is amazing, and just popping an m.2 into a motherboard directly is just so… easy. And I think Gen5s are what, 2.5x faster than what you’re showing here?
The screw situation is finicky. It’s a weird mix between you’re supposed to have screws from your case/motherboard or sometimes the drive comes with one. But if you move stuff and drop the tiny tiny screw it’s a hassle. Every motherboard should just have the little tab you just turn to keep it in place.
Plus the newer gen fast drives get hot so they need a heatsink. The fastest maybe need heatsink plus airflow. So then you need an extra fan if you don’t have enough airflow which is easy because it’s flush against the motherboard and sometimes blocked by the GPU.
Full agree on the screw situation, although my most recent mobi addressed that with a sort of… turnable plastic lock thing? And a built in heatsink and “shield” for the gen 5 and 4 ports, so I haven’t had any issues with heat. I get the sense we’ll have a better standard as time goes in though, Gen5 is really really new.
But even the gen 3s are lovely. Maybe I just hate SATA cables, haha.
I started on 3.5" HDDs in the 90s. I am running 3.5" HDDs today. They are still the most cost efficient.
I think I have two I could put on the left side. A “full-height” 5.25 inch drive with 5 megabytes and a DEC removable disk platter assembly, somewhere over a foot in diameter and 8 to 10 inches high. I don’t remember how much capacity that had. It was for a RP04 or RP06 drive.
