The group responsible is “Collective Shout”, the same org has targeted Steam before.

There are calls on social media now to contact Mastercard, Visa and co. and file complaints.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    First they came for the incest/rape games, which most people somewhat agree with (although the principle is still wrong) Next up is all nsfw games. After that, it’ll be mainstream and indie games altogether. This never stops with just one “victory” for these groups.

    • Broadfern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s going to come down to anything with even a whisper of LGBTQ+/minority/disability/etc representation, just like with books.

      They start with the “egregious” content (not that it’s necessarily right to remove that either), then narrow it down until it shapes up into hegemonic conformity and systemic oppression via media (there’s a term for it, kind of like stochastic violence but not quite that I can’t remember atm).

      • TipRing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 days ago

        BDSM games have been targeted as well for “sexual violence”. Only straight, vanilla PiV missionary for the express purposes of having children within the confines of marriage where nobody is enjoying it porn will be left.

      • simple@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        14 days ago

        They’re not going to ban 90% of video games, not everything is a slippery slope

          • simple@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            And it won’t happen because companies won’t allow them to ban a trillion dollar industry, you knob. Banning adult games isn’t remotely comparable. Most video games rely on violence and it’s too big of an industry to fail, adult games have a tiny following and were an easy target.

            They banned adult games?! That means they’ll ban all violent media! They’ll eventually come for all media, they’ll come for our computers, they’ll trap us in cages! It’s a slippery slope!

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        Steam and Itch are both victims in this matter, their hands are tied. If the payment processors simply refuse to process any payments unless they comply, there’s no point in trying to put pressure on them. I’m pretty sure they were happy to take people’s money for these games and still would be, if they could so while saving face.

    • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Yes, but.

      Everyone should read the open letter that’s linked in the itch statement, to have a fully informed opinion.

      There definitely is a line. Everyone can choose were they draw it. You don’t have to draw it in a way where you end up defending things that are kinda messed up.

      There is definitely a hill worth fighting on in that area. I don’t think it’s this exact one.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        ·
        14 days ago

        My line is these payment processors being judge, jury and executioner about what material they deem valid. So I am fundamentally opposed.

        • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          I agree, but they aren’t.

          I am specifically saying this, because my democratic country has laws that would also cover these things the letter mentions and would also deem them wrong. The people normally charged with upholding that law, are just dumb, “not from the internet” and overworked with other stuff.

          Please check what laws your country has around the topic of glorification of crime and violence.

          We also don’t know what the payment processors told itch and steam.

          Itch and steam are doing what they are doing as a blanket move, to create a situation where they can stay in business for now and deal with the problem at all.

          My bet would be that they “allowed nsfw stuff”, turned a blind eye, and now suddenly noticed they actually have a really big legal problem, with actual laws and the fact that it was an NGO and not an official legal institution that started this, was dumb luck and now they mostly need time and cover their own arse.


          And I fully support the opinion that it shouldn’t be the payment processors forcing these sorts of things. But reality is messy and if this was the path of least resistance to get something done, such is life.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            14 days ago

            If GTA V is allowed, I’m pretty certain most of what we’ve seen from NSFW games is as well. Regardless, a payment company should not be acting as judge for such things, just as media companies should not act as judge on copyright infringement on YouTube.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Moral judgement or suppression of fiction/artistic expression is deeply and profoundly unethical. How you or I or anyone else feels about something that isn’t “real” is inconsequential. If you allow any line to be crossed in this, then every line can and will be crossed.

        • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I’m pretty sure I can find fictional things immoral? Why would it be unethical to have an opinion on fictional things?

          Factually, all the lines that you allow to be crossed are crossed and all lines that are collectively defended are usually not crossed. That’s culture. It’s arbitrary and not absolute.