• Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably need to be client side tbh but when someone mass posts the same article across multiple communities and instances I only see it once with a list of where its posted if you go into it.

      • imperator3733@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or the comment sections could just be merged together in the client view. Each thread of comments would belong to one (and only one) instance, so it shouldn’t be difficult to merge those lists together when presenting the aggregate view to the user.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If they use the crosspost feature this should already happen. Of course no apps support that yet to my knowledge.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago
    • Low hanging: user defined multi-communities
    • Hard (high hanging fruit): allow users to look and behave like communities so that we can follow each other (and masto users too ) as we would normal communities, where each user has their own (or multiple!) “community” they can populate and moderate as they see fit.
    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as this is opt-in, I’m okay with this. I personally don’t want to have followers.

    • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t stop using Lemmy because of “user profiles”, but this was one of the worst things implemented by Reddit. Basically started the slide into Facebook-tier

  • Rescuer6394@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    add some damn good mod tools. lemmy will die if the user base grows and the mod tools do not.

  • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Less community repetition. I feel like it spreads out potential members and makes each community smaller with repetitive content. I wish communities could be more linked so they share content and members.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had a thought, what if clients allowed users to mix and match communities so that they show as one? You could bundle all the gaming communities into one for instance. You’d still see where each publication originates from but they would appear in the same feed

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        One idea: Community owners can link their community with another, like friend requests between communities. From that point they act like one community with multiple owners. Everything is duplicated, and that includes removing content and banning users. Client side apps can show them as one community.

  • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    The ability to easily link to a specific post or comment in a way that works across instances/clients, like you can with communities.

  • heimchen@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Link communies. When two communies are linked they act like one with multiple names distributed on multiple instances. This would solve the dublicate communities on different instance problem.

      • blue_berry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it could work like this:

        The moderators of each community are primarily responsible for their posts and keep an eye on the moderation by the other community. If one side is unhappy with the moderation of the other, they can cut the link and vice versa.

        Administrators act as if the others community’s post are part of the community on their instance too. If there are weird posts, the community gets banned etc.

        I think Linking would be great.

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure but I don’t think so. It would require the server to store the alt text for the picture.

        And it would also require people to actually use the feature. I still don’t know how Mastodon managed to pull this off in this regard…

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Perhaps it would help a bit, I don’t know. Even if it does, it would be far less than having the sharer to actually write something, and telling the reader the focus of the picture.

        I’ll give you a personal albeit real example of that. I posted this picture in Mastodon, some time ago:

        See the rest of the text for a description of this pic.

        A machine learning model could theoretically say something like there’s a tabby cat in the picture, one semi-abstract acrylic painting, one figurative oil painting. Both paintings rest on a white wall… except that most of those things don’t matter, what matters is what the cat is doing towards the viewer.

        Contrast it with the translated version of the alt text that I’ve provided: A playful tabby cat, leaning against the back of a chair, looking at the viewer. Her head, upper thorax, and paws are visible. One paw is holding the back of the chair; the other paw is on the air, in an “I got you!” movement towards the viewer. It’s completely different and, when I wrote this, I hoped that both blind and non-blind users could get something out of the picture that they wouldn’t without the alt text.

        And it’s the same deal with other Mastodon posters, not just me. This system - where the user is expected to provide alt text - works well, IMO.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I do like that Mastodon reminds you to add Alt text before posting an image. People think alt text is just for the blind or near blind but sometimes I have a hard time figuring out why a picture was posted and the alt text clears that up. All that to say, it’s reminders help create the habit of adding text descriptors, which helps everyone.

  • whiskers@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hide read posts only from the frontage. There should be an option to have them visible in their community itself to refer back later.

      • whiskers@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @ljdawson@lemmy.world my request is a bit different. I actually use Sync. When we hide posts from the frontpage using “Hide Read Posts” toggle, it hides the post from both the frontpage and the community where the post was posted. I’d like to have a setting where it only hides read posts from the frontpage.

        Sometimes I like to go back to a community (like Starfield for e.g.) to read posts that I hid previously from frontpage to see newer discussions or just look back at things after a couple of days.

          • whiskers@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Umm, I’m not sure as I didn’t use Sync for Reddit, if it was an app specific feature.

            In the current Lemmy app if we hide read posts, they are kinda lost. I’d like to visit a community and even see the read posts that were hidden from the frontpage. It could be an option for the user to decide if they want the current method or let the hidden “read” posts be hidden only from the All/Subscribed/Local frontpage (and not from the community page itself)

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Some sort of organizational hierarchy or tagging system so the user could block wide swaths of communities like sports, celebrities, music, or whatever they aren’t interested in; without having to block each community individually.

  • Convict45@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The pie in the sky answer is “get all my friends and relations to use it.”

    More realistically: I wish I could follow or friend a person here.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your own posts should show in your profile even you have Show Read Posts off. And there should be an easy visible toggle while browsing.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like the “show context” link to work. Maybe that’s just me? It used to work but no longer. It’d be helpful when I go to a post from the reply notification thing. (viewing this on the web in Firefox)