• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Since this article is regarding USA, it’s worse than that. We are living in the golden age of insanity.
    Delusional religious people and sociopathic Nazis have taken over USA.

    For the civilized world there are warning signs, but insanity is unlikely to take control.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It not only gave way, it actually paved the way.
        Brainwashing about American individual freedom ideals, have become idolization of billionaire sociopaths as the ultimate expressions of individual freedom.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Dark Ages” comes from Renaissance and Enlightenment scholars saying, “Thank God we’re so smart. Those people were morons.”

        Also, it was after Rome really fell apart, darker times then the Empire certainly.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        in a way i think yes. in the dark ages at least any insane cults and ideas couldn’t spread far. if your village or castle happened to have dark ages version of ben shapiro then his words aren’t going to go far (unless they infected the local ruler as well, and even then it’d still be contained within your area, or your country at worst). If you were on the receiving end of insanity you could always just kind of– pack up and move to another village, walk 30km away and you’re like a new man! Worst case scenario find your way to a port, fuck off to another country - passports or border control did not exist, passage was often granted for free to those able bodied that joined the crew for the voyage.

        obviously i’m romanticising here a bit, modern medicine and technology makes day to day life easier. but it also makes other things much harder. our privacy is going extinct at an alarming rate, freedom of movement across borders belongs to distant memories of our great grandparents, (unless you’re french) your protests will be ignored and/or vilified, and if you dare care about other humans and speak up about it you can be labelled as a terrorist in some places

        i do truly hope that those years of unrest aren’t here to stay…

    • freedom@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m starting to believe natural selection didn’t just get us to where we are, it kept us here.

      The genetic variation in the human brain will lead to more and more good and bad variations generation after generation. Stupidity used to have deadly consequences, now it’s just poverty (or the White House).

      Our society wants to be inclusive and accepting and liberating and safe, but what if that just doesn’t work with our current make? What if these mild deviations and mutations only progress forwards when the weak traits perish? We don’t have that mechanism anymore so weak and dangerous personality traits persist and continue to vote.

      It’s a scary thought, but I can’t see anything wrong with the logic, especially observing how it’s taking hold across the globe.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is a social media aspect to this. We have amplified the worst behaviors and reenforced them with monetary gains. We broke the incentive structure in America where being a doctor was the highest calling. The media is also incentivized to spew division, we’ve basically made money the greatest reward in society, and only award it to the worst people. Its a really effective way to skew the sociopathic tendencies of the masses.

        • eldebryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Frankly, between blaming welfare and going for eugenics or blaming capitalism and going for socialism I’d much prefer the latter.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            That was the early America I grew up in. We were taught to value the garbage man. We were taught to value anyone contributing to society. We were also taught to contribute to society. We had the history channel and uniform education where we all agreed on what happened in the past. We had media that would highlight noteable people and positive events in communities. You used to get the local TV spotlight by being a good person not a bad person. Anyway, the list could go on, but we could make America great again by bringing back some of the more socialist policies and educational practices that we had not even 20-30 years ago. We’ve been a socialist country since we decided public education for all and created social security. You don’t have to keep ramming the division part dude. You can just advocate for popular socialist policies. It’s way easier. Medicare for all. Improve public education, increase access to information, restore local media.

            Seriously, a lot of you leftists are more detrimental to socialist policies than any of the right wing. Think about how you advocate. The only difference between capitalism and socialism is how we allocate the capital and align it with social values.

            • eldebryn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Don’t fucking tone-police me. I’m not a politician idgaf about being palpable or “appealing to all sides”.

              Being rude doesn’t make someone wrong and appealing to everyone doesn’t make one right either.

              I want socialism, education and welfare and decent living standarda for all. I want fascists and the multimillionaire class to stop existing. That’s it, I’m not gonna sugarcoat it.

              People need to be willing to accept that their votes have been supporting fascists and going against their best interests and they need to be willing to consider a different perspective for that. It’s not my responsibility to cater to those that spent their lives shitting on the very possibility of critical thinking.

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Seriously though… what about a Democrat voter who is gay, but works for a Palantir founder because it makes the most money? What about people who are opposed in votes and ideology but complicit in actions? What of the millions of well off, well educated democrats who won’t sacrifice anything to oppose the fascists? I honestly hold them complicit as well. Fascism is totally fine as long as their QoL isn’t diminished. What do we do to convince those people? The ones who vote status quo while it gets worse every year? The slow enablers of fascism?

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Does blame itself matter though? Can we steer opinions with such a thing and make real change or is that ability an illusion, and blame a …verbal masturbation?

            • eldebryn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’d argue it does. You can’t improve things if you don’t first identify what the root cause of the problem is.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is not genetic, USA is not an old enough country to have had any significant genetic evolution.
        It is instead as Richard Dawkins has described Memetic.
        Americans have a tradition of being extremely proud of being free, this feature has been advertised as the most significant thing about USA to Americans to a degree that is akin to brainwashing.
        While freedom admittedly is a good thing, the way Americans praise it religiously has turned out to be toxic.
        Because sociopathy is now seen as the ultimate expression of individual freedom, so sociopathy is widely admired as a virtue.
        This combined with how sociopathy is often rewarded economically, because exploiting people and grabbing all the money for yourself is considered being smart, and the #2 thing religiously praised in USA is money that also reward sociopathic behavior.

        This is all about social standards, and the values of society, and has nothing to do with evolutionary shortcomings.
        That said, the way some people here claim you are pushing eugenics is completely baseless.

        But contrary to your thinking, it seems to me that evolution favor the intelligent more now than it ever did. The demands to intelligence to do well in society are ever increasing, and doing well is an advantage when wanting to have children.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m starting to lose hope in the progress of humanity at all. I am pretty sure we wont solve our critical problems. We just arent capable of doing so as a group. And we will keep bombing and burning until the planet cant sustain itself any longer. We are not really progressing in our social infrastructure and philosophies at all-- we might as well be humans from 5000 years ago, only sedentary, holding iphones and bathed in chemicals all day.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s a conclusion you pulled out your ass, and is not supported in what he writes.

        • freedom@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You’re the one bringing up eugenics buddy. Reading comprehension: the long lost art.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nope, humans have always been stupid. People said the same shit when the printing press was invented, or TV, or whatever.

      Seriously, crack a history book. Modern times are actually pretty good, even with all the bullshit.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s pretty good compared to, say, 100 years ago. But is it better than, idk, 10 years ago? This is highly dependent where you live, of course. But, in the US, I can 100% say life was better a decade ago and people weren’t outright rejecting intellectualism en masse.

        • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 months ago

          The idiots didn’t have their own eco chamber. As an unfortunate byproduct of the social media they realised how many of them there are and organised themselves.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          54, American here. Yeah, I think we peaked in the 80s and 90s after a small setback in the 70s. Through 2010 was pretty good as well except for 9/11 fucking up our politics and legislation.

          • bassomitron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’d agree the US peaked in the 90s. 2008 really fucked us for almost a decade, though. Economy had essentially recovered by 2014/2015sh until COVID. I’m almost 40, so most of my adult life has been plagued by crisis after crisis.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Quite my last tech support job in 2007, hated it, ready to move up. Didn’t score another IT role for 7 years, hated the job I was in.

      • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Humans have always been stupid but today technology has made it easier for the dumbest among us to be more influential than any stupid person of any prior era. This, we are in the golden age of stupidity.

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You could say the exact same thing about the smartest people being able to spread their message, and the two effects cancel out.

          Same age as any other, more or less. These are human problems that won’t be fixed until we’re no longer human.

      • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        With that said, lately americans seem like a new insane kind of stupid.

      • godrik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep, as long as we don’t change/better ourselves on fundamental/cognitive level, the result will always be the same. Can’t make the play field better if the ground rules are broken. Most systems today are shaped by excusing violence and injustice. Violence is violence, no matter what.

      • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        New media indeed coincides with revolutions. I disagree with your final assessment. We have yet to see how this turn of new media plays out.

        Good or bad is a relative. The frame of reference should be contemporary. Just because we ostensibly have technological luxuries not mean things are going well right now. Authoritarianism on another up cycle.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    AI is also putting pressure on the ability to have multiple, independent sources by diverting traffic away from those sites. Just like reddit kills independent phpbb boards, AI will (and is) killing critical thought.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes but this has accelerated it. I dont actually read anything anymore. I just ask chat gpt. In the end, it will make me dependent on it. And so many people will go that route, for different reasons.

        Doing a web search now feels like wasting a lot of time when chat gpt has the answer already.

        I think this is already changing everything. School system, education, learning, jobs, careers, etc.

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I blame google. Seriously.

          I almost exclusively use Perplexity to search for things now. When it gives me reliable information and actually answers the question I ask it, it’s fantastic. But that’s still only around 80-90% of the time. That’s actually not very reliable at all by any metric which is worth paying attention to.

          But once upon a time you could search google and it’d look for the words that you searched for. But for years now it’s used “natural language” searches, which means that if you’re searching for a specific word it might not even look for that word at all. It might even take a definition of that word that you didn’t intend and search instead for a synonym to fit that definition.

          Add SEO, ads, and paid search boosting, and you end up with results that are far less useful than they used to be. Add to that the fact that a lot of the actual sites being searched are now AI-generated themselves, and google is now a bad way to try to find something. And every other search engine has followed suit.

          So I use Perplexity because even with an objectively bad hit rate - and the fact that it basically returns one answer from multiple sources, rather than multiple sources some of which might not be related to what I’m looking for, and therefore when it misunderstands is perhaps worse than google - it’s better than a traditional search engine for almost all text-based searches.

          It’s clearly unsustainable, though, and for many different reasons. It’s certainly an iteresting time to be observing all of this. I can’t help but wonder what the landscape will look like in 10 years.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I never ask these bots because they are all the time wrong enough to not be useful for me.

          I don’t need construction advice which gets one of the mentioned materials completely wrong. I don’t need technical advice that invents syntax and libraries. I don’t need mathematical advice that produces formulae with errors. It’s even worse that you have to look very attentively before you’ll notice that error.

          It doesn’t feel like something new, though, more like return to badly machine-translated texts or those with breaking typos found in search engines in year 2003. And even generated, by Markov chains or by mentally ill humans or whatever. Remember when “googling” meant checking 20+ pages of results and that was normal.

          I don’t know why a tool for quick wrong answers is so popular. I can make up quick wrong answers too. I use the Internet for trying to find correct answers.

          • architect@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s more correct than Google search top results consistently.

            Even better when it gets to know you.

            And you always ask it for its sources.

            They are right. I’m not saying this is a good thing. We have to save the internet by making an alternate.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have a book titled “Generation Doof” (Generation Stupid), and yes, this book got it right.

    I’m afraid that most people under 30 would simply cease to function if the internet suddenly went away.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean I’d be absolutely, jump out of a window, levels of absolutely fucked without the internet.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Many people would, but I think I could rig something to have a sufficient amount of power in the house.

        I can still read books and manuals, and i do have those books and manuals in paper form.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You don’t realize how hard it is to do physically the work of water pumps in the grid, which allow you to have running water. Or to collect firewood (or some other burnable fuel) to use much of it every damn day for cooking, heating water, heating your habitat.

          And the water will have unbalanced composition, so things you are getting from almost any findable water you’ll have to get specifically. Imagine a water supply short on lithium, but with horrible concentrations of iron, or something like that.

        • cheesorist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          and you think youre special? most people who cant read shit on paper cant read it on the internet. “reading books, and manuals in paper format” doesnt take that much brain power

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve noticed no one has books anymore though. I used to be able to go to peoples houses, look at their bookcase, and learn lots about them. No one has bookcases full of books on display anymore except really old people. Even our library has been mostly emptied and has maybe a fifth of the number of books it used to have. I have no idea where all those book went.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      God no. Are you joking?

      Religions are the absolute bane of human philosophy. Its prepackaged bundles of ideas that no one is allowed to challenge. Most religions are basically ridiculous and easily proved false. They serve to control. All of them were written by flawed people from long ago, and it shows.

      The meaning of all writing is based on the time it exists in. Whats in the bible (and Koran, and Talmud) today doesnt mean what it meant two thousand years ago, and even then it was probably sketchy. Now its worse and getting more irrelevant all the time. But say that out loud in any setting except an anonymous internet chatroom, and everyone shuns you, at best.