• jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I suppose I may be overestimating Louvre security. I guess I would assume a criminal might have to be somewhat smart to overcome what I presumed to be higher security than you might find at a typical target for idiot criminals.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Oh yes, there’s basically no security. At least nothing to deal with a quick grab like that. The only concern seems to have been terrorism. And even then,it was clearly not very well taken into account.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Curious why you got a downvote, if there’s a good reason, I would have found a reply more informative…

          • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Presumably because I said "no security ", which is a bit of an exaggeration. Very inadequate security would have been better. Supposedly there’s a plan to upgrade the whole thing, but that should take a year or two still.