At least copilot only does shit when you click on it, even if it is useless.
Unlike Google, which wastes tons of electric and water every single search without the users consent. That is a lot more damaging to society than whatever Microsoft does.
I love how accurate this image is. As they hammer more the structure becomes more and more unstable.
I’ve noticed the AI search suggestions from Bing and Google are just becoming more and more inaccurate as they feed off themselves. I can’t even imagine what it’s doing to systems we can’t see.
Everything is fine. It will become god and fix all our problems any second now, and if you say that’s mathematically impossible you’re just a hater.
“We will create God then ask him for money.”
TIL Catholics invented AI
“It doesn’t matter that we are burning 1 trillion dollars with no pat to revenue, because we will create God and it will make money meaningless.”
"Also, it will cure cancer and solve Global Warming. I know dumb people like you that can’t even get a trillion dollars to burn care about those things.
Exactly!
i mean, we have the solutions to a lot of problems already
traffic? public trains
hunger? just like, feed people
global warming? reduce fossil fuel usage and stop poisoning the oceans
homeless? literally so many empty homes, put people in them???
and we’ve had many smart people create step by step plans for all of these!
the thing is… i guess rich people want a solution that doesn’t involve them paying for something that’s good not just for them but for others? so all those plans fail at step 1 - have empathy
I mean, nitpick, but if you blamed mathematics you actually would be. The observation that AI/LLMs are highly unreliable and don’t appear to be getting any better is empirical.
We ha e known since the 50s. The math was done.
Hmm. I’m not sure what you’re referring to. Do you have a link?
No but Turing was involved, and the guy who wrote ELIZA
The tech isn’t new. That’s all the effort I’m willing to put in for this trash.
And that paper’s name? Albert Einstein. I can’t find anything on Weizenbaum and Turing authoring together. Weizenbaum seems to have written mostly prose and code, even - he’s not really thought of for his mathematical innovations, although obviously math was his original field.
Back in the 50’s people thought conventional algorithms, like everybody here has worked with, were going to reach human intelligence. They could play chess, and chess is smart guy stuff, so obviously recognising a bird should be easy, right? Well, they figured out that wasn’t right, and so began the first AI winter.
The tech of deep neural nets is in fact fairly new. Like, arguably it didn’t become a thing until the Cold War was ending, although there were a lot of precursors, and it kind of arrived gradually.
‘Deep neural nets’ that’s not a thing, dude. If it was, it was out on ice for this trash.
Also it’s building on top of existing fragility (the thin pillar below), and only making it worse
Not just MS though, right?
MS is especially egregious about it.
They’re planning the next iteration of Windows to be primarily AI-driven - as in, the AI runs things for you.
AI ruins things for you
FTFY
Most developers in general.
As a developer this has not been my experience, we all hate it with the fiery passion of a thousand suns.
My former boss fucking loved it though, but he was a PM not a dev.
I guess that last sentence sums it up well.
More like C Level people that force devs to make this crap
Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏
There are job postings that not only actively encourage it as part of the job description but ask that you be enthusiastic about it
It will collapse due to the AI slop(e)
Meanwhile that little block at the bottom is still doing its best to keep it all together. For now.
could it be the foss and publicly fund research and training I wonder
DNS?
MS can’t force that one to use AI on development. But they can force almost everybody up.
Love the person in the background getting up, looking over and just sitting back down again like Greg sledgehammering his monitor to pieces is nothing extraordinary
Functional programmers when the content of their PC’s memory change (no longer safe, and no longer upholds functional programming paradigms):
System76 2k PC
They are putting it into washing machines these days.
“Oh good catch! How astute of you! Of course I should have added detergent before running the cycle!”
User: Add enough detergent for this weight of clothes.
Washing machine AI: OK, I have added the correct amount for you, ready to start the wash.
User: You only added fabric softener, I need you to add detergent. Please weigh the clothes and add the detergent based on that weight.
Washing machine AI: Ah, I see what you mean. I have now weighed the clothes and added the needed amount of detergent.
User: you just added more fabric softener. Do not add any more of that, I only need detergent. Please, add detergent.
Washing machine AI: I’m sorry, I misunderstood you before. I have now made sure to add detergent.
User: you added more fabric softener…
See, the solution is just to not use softener. Haven’t used it in a decade, haven’t missed it either.
Though the AI might come up with a different fuckup.
Sorry, I cannot add any detergent because my detergent sensor is telling me the tray is empty.
There we go. Thanks for being more creative than me.
More like doing a big sloppy crap of AI on top of everything.
